Routine maintenance works of state roads in 2027-2032 (in Bauska, Ogre, Riga, Preiļi and Dagda territories) (4 contracts)

This tender for state road maintenance demonstrates good clarity and data consistency, but is significantly hampered by the undisclosed estimated value and reported restricted document access, raising serious concerns about fairness and completeness.

The tender generally adheres to legal requirements with a clear procedure type, appropriate CPV codes, and reasonable submission deadlines. However, the non-disclosure of the estimated value represents a notable deviation from standard transparency and disclosure practices in public procurement.

The tender description is clear, and requirements are extensively detailed across multiple documents, including specific technical, financial, and submission criteria for each of the four parts. The presence of consolidated regulations and historical data further enhances clarity for bidders.

While most essential information such as title, organization, deadlines, and duration is provided, the critical omission of the estimated contract value significantly impacts the completeness of the tender documentation. All required documents are referenced, but the missing value is a major gap.

The fairness of this tender is severely compromised by two critical issues: the undisclosed estimated value, which hinders bidders' ability to assess the opportunity accurately, and the reported restricted document access, which creates an uneven playing field. While e-procurement is enabled, these fundamental transparency issues are highly problematic.

The tender supports e-procurement and clearly specifies the contract start date and duration, which are positive for practicality. However, the reported restricted document access and the absence of specific financing information beyond the contracting authority reduce the overall ease of participation for potential bidders.

The tender exhibits good data consistency across most fields, with logical dates and no reported disputes or suspensions. While the estimated value is missing (a completeness issue), the existing data points are largely coherent, and some automated flags appear to contradict more detailed information provided.

The tender documentation does not indicate any specific focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. There is also no mention of EU funding, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.