Digital Engagement Platform - Communications App (Provision of)

This tender for a digital engagement platform exhibits significant deficiencies in transparency and completeness, particularly regarding evaluation criteria and estimated value, which severely impact fairness and clarity. While basic information is present and consistent, the lack of modern e-procurement features and sustainability considerations are notable drawbacks.

The tender defines its procedure type as 'Below threshold - open competition' and assigns a relevant CPV code. The submission deadline provides sufficient time from today's date. However, the provided summary lacks specific details on mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements, which, if not fully detailed in the complete tender documents, could represent a legal compliance gap for transparency.

The general description of the communication app's purpose and core functionalities is clear. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it impossible for bidders to understand how their proposals will be judged. Furthermore, the requirement to integrate with 'current systems' without detailing those systems introduces ambiguity.

While basic information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, duration, and classification codes are present, several critical elements are missing or incomplete. The estimated value is classified, hindering full understanding of the project's scale. Most significantly, the absence of evaluation criteria is a major omission. Additionally, the summary lacks specific details on mandatory exclusion and eligibility grounds.

The fairness of this tender is significantly compromised. The classified estimated value prevents potential bidders from accurately assessing the opportunity and allocating resources. The complete absence of evaluation criteria creates an opaque and potentially arbitrary selection process, making it impossible for bidders to compete effectively. The lack of electronic submission also presents a barrier to equal access in modern procurement.

The tender's practicality is hampered by the stated lack of electronic submission, which is a significant drawback in contemporary procurement practices. While the contract start date and duration are clearly specified, the undisclosed estimated value makes it difficult for potential suppliers to gauge the project's financial scope and feasibility.

The provided data exhibits good consistency. Key fields such as title, reference, organization, description, deadlines, and classification codes are populated and logically aligned. There are no indications of disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are consistent.

This tender demonstrates a very low commitment to sustainability. There are no indications of green procurement criteria, social aspects, or an innovation focus. The tender is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.