Legal Compliance75/100
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes correctly, and there are no reported disputes. It references national procurement guidelines (PPN002). However, the absence of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided text (though implied to be in full documents) and a missing reveal date are minor deficiencies.
•Mandatory exclusion grounds not explicitly detailed in provided text
•Missing reveal date
Clarity55/100
The program description and AI-extracted requirements are clear and well-structured. However, a significant concern is the absence of a full list of evaluation criteria and their respective weightings; only social value (10%) is specified, making the overall evaluation process unclear for potential bidders.
•Full evaluation criteria and their weightings are not specified
Completeness60/100
Most essential information, including title, organization, reference, value, duration, and location, is provided. Requirements are detailed, and documents are available. The primary gap is the lack of comprehensive evaluation criteria, which is a crucial component for a complete tender.
•Full evaluation criteria and their weightings are not specified
Fairness45/100
The tender promotes fairness through e-procurement via Jaggaer, encourages SME/VCSE participation, and discloses the estimated value. Requirements do not appear tailored. However, the critical omission of full evaluation criteria severely undermines transparency and objectivity, making it difficult for bidders to prepare competitive and compliant proposals.
•Full evaluation criteria and their weightings are not specified, impacting transparency and objectivity
Practicality90/100
The tender excels in practicality, clearly outlining the e-submission process via Jaggaer, providing a direct URL and helpdesk contact. The contract start date, duration, and estimated value are all clearly specified, facilitating bidder planning.
Data Consistency85/100
Dates are logical and consistent throughout the tender information. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include an empty 'Liable Person' field and missing codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure', though the descriptive text is present.
•Empty 'Liable Person' field
•Missing 'Type Code' and 'Procedure Code'
Sustainability65/100
The tender includes a strong social value component, weighted at 10% and specifically addressing skills development (MAC2a), which is commendable. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement criteria or a focus on innovation, and it is not EU funded.
•No explicit green procurement criteria
•No explicit innovation focus