Venue Booking System

This market engagement for a venue booking system is clearly defined in its purpose and requirements, demonstrating good clarity and comprehensive system specifications. However, transparency is reduced by the undisclosed estimated value and the use of email for submissions, while sustainability aspects are entirely absent.

As a market engagement, the tender is generally compliant in its intent to gather information. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no disputes. However, the lack of a formal procedure type, undisclosed estimated value, and missing reveal date for the engagement period reduce overall transparency and adherence to best practices for public information.

The tender excels in clarity. The description of the project's purpose, scope, and the detailed list of system requirements are unambiguous and well-documented. The AI-extracted requirements accurately reflect the original content, and the instructions for submitting expressions of interest are clear.

Most essential information, including title, organization, reference, description, deadlines, duration, and location (NUTS code, venue list), is provided. The system requirements are comprehensive. The primary gaps are the undisclosed estimated value and the absence of a formal procedure type, which, while less critical for market engagement, still represent missing data points.

The requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific supplier, ensuring a level playing field in that regard. Full document access is provided. However, the undisclosed estimated value limits suppliers' ability to fully assess the opportunity, and the reliance on email for submissions, rather than a dedicated e-procurement portal, offers less structured and auditable access, slightly impacting fairness.

The tender provides a clear contract start date and duration. However, the reliance on email for submitting expressions of interest is less practical and efficient than a dedicated electronic submission system. Furthermore, specific financing information beyond the undisclosed estimated value is not available.

The tender exhibits good data consistency with logical dates and no reported disputes or suspensions. Most key fields are populated. However, the "Type" and "Procedure" fields are marked as "None," the "Liable Person" is empty, and the "Estimated Value" is explicitly "Not disclosed," indicating some gaps in comprehensive data population.

This tender does not include any explicit criteria or considerations related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. There is no indication of EU funding, which often drives higher sustainability standards. This represents a significant missed opportunity to integrate broader public value objectives.