Tenders

London and Quadrant Housing Trust - External Wall review – Fire Inspections and Remedials Dynamic Purchase System (DPS)

Open
Deadline
2127 days left
December 22, 2031
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
032114-2021
Value
Not disclosed
Location
London, United Kingdom
Published
February 16, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

December 22, 2021

Deadline for Questions

December 15, 2031

Submission Deadline

December 22, 2031

Contract Start Date

December 23, 2031

Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
1 months
Location
London
Type
Other
66
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

London and Quadrant Housing Trust and its subsidiary Quadrant Construction Services are one of the largest providers of affordable housing in the UK, housing over 250,000 people in more than 95,000 homes, primarily across London and the South East of England. London and Quadrant Housing Trust are tendering for the provision of services for external wall review – fire inspections and remedials for London and Quadrant’s self-delivered new build projects to comply with the Public Contracts Regulations 2015. The objective of this tender process is to establish a dynamic purchasing system with the tenderers and London and Quadrant Housing Trust. The dates and contract value are estimates and could be subject to change. This tender is for service providers and consultants only.

Requirements & Qualifications

16 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (7)
Technical (5)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit the application by the deadline: 2031-12-22 18:00:00.
--Apply for admission to the Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Comply with the Public Contracts Regulations 2015, which includes mandatory exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Be a service provider.
--Be a consultant.
--Be capable of providing external wall review services.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Demonstrate expertise in external wall review.
--Demonstrate expertise in fire inspections.
--Demonstrate expertise in remedial services for external walls.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided information.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

1 documents available with AI summaries

Official PDF VersionPDF
032114-2021_official.pdf

London and Quadrant Housing Trust is establishing a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for service providers and consultants to deliver external wall fire inspections and remedial services for their new build projects across London and the South East.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

66
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender aims to establish a Dynamic Purchasing System for external wall fire inspections and remedial services. While the description outlines the scope and eligibility, the significant lack of detailed documentation and financial information raises concerns regarding transparency and fair competition.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

The tender explicitly references compliance with the Public Contracts Regulations 2015, including mandatory exclusion grounds, which is a fundamental legal requirement. The use of a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) is a legally permissible procurement procedure.

Clarity40/100

The description clearly defines the scope of services (external wall review, fire inspections, remedials) and the geographical area. However, the complete absence of detailed tender documents significantly hinders overall clarity regarding specific requirements, evaluation methodology, and contractual terms.

Lack of detailed tender documents.
Ambiguity regarding the 'Restricted' type versus the stated objective of establishing a Dynamic Purchasing System.
Completeness75/100

The tender is severely incomplete due to the complete absence of any attached documents. Essential information such as detailed specifications, terms and conditions, full evaluation criteria, and instructions for tenderers are missing, making it impossible for potential bidders to prepare a comprehensive and compliant submission.

No documents attached.
Missing detailed specifications for services.
Fairness60/100

The lack of detailed information, particularly regarding evaluation criteria and financial requirements, creates an uneven playing field. Without clear and comprehensive documentation, potential bidders cannot fully understand the expectations or how their submissions will be assessed, potentially disadvantaging smaller or less experienced firms.

Lack of detailed evaluation criteria.
Absence of specific financial requirements.
Practicality40/100

The tender's current state, with no attached documents, makes it impractical for potential suppliers to respond effectively. The stated contract duration of 1 month for a DPS is highly unusual and impractical for a system designed for long-term, recurring services.

No documents attached, making it impractical for bidders to prepare a submission.
Impractical 'Contract Duration' of 1 month for a Dynamic Purchasing System, which is typically established for several years.
Data Consistency100/100

There is a significant inconsistency between the stated 'Type: Restricted' and the explicit objective of establishing a 'Dynamic Purchasing System'. While a DPS can be established via a restricted procedure, the primary classification should reflect the DPS nature. Furthermore, the 'Contract Duration' of 1 month for a DPS is inconsistent with the typical long-term nature of such systems.

Inconsistency between 'Type: Restricted' and 'Dynamic Purchasing System' as the procurement procedure.
Inconsistent 'Contract Duration' of 1 month for a Dynamic Purchasing System.
Sustainability0/100

The provided information does not include any specific requirements or considerations related to environmental, social, or economic sustainability criteria.

No green procurement criteria specified.
No social criteria specified.

Strengths

Clear identification of the procuring organization and service scope.
Explicit reference to Public Contracts Regulations 2015 for legal compliance.
Well-defined eligibility and technical capability requirements for the service type.
Utilizes a Dynamic Purchasing System, offering flexibility for future call-offs.

Concerns

Complete absence of tender documents, making it impossible to assess full requirements.
Estimated value not disclosed, hindering market analysis for potential bidders.
Lack of detailed evaluation criteria, compromising transparency and fairness.
Inconsistent 'Contract Duration' of 1 month for a Dynamic Purchasing System.
No specific financial requirements detailed, creating uncertainty for bidders.

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish all comprehensive tender documents, including detailed specifications, terms and conditions, and full evaluation criteria.
2. Clarify the estimated value of the DPS or provide a clear methodology for future call-off contract values.
3. Correct the 'Contract Duration' to reflect the typical multi-year term of a Dynamic Purchasing System.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Loading competitor predictions...

Add to Pipeline