16 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
1 documents available with AI summaries
London and Quadrant Housing Trust is establishing a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for service providers and consultants to deliver external wall fire inspections and remedial services for their new build projects across London and the South East.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender aims to establish a Dynamic Purchasing System for external wall fire inspections and remedial services. While the description outlines the scope and eligibility, the significant lack of detailed documentation and financial information raises concerns regarding transparency and fair competition.
The tender explicitly references compliance with the Public Contracts Regulations 2015, including mandatory exclusion grounds, which is a fundamental legal requirement. The use of a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) is a legally permissible procurement procedure.
The description clearly defines the scope of services (external wall review, fire inspections, remedials) and the geographical area. However, the complete absence of detailed tender documents significantly hinders overall clarity regarding specific requirements, evaluation methodology, and contractual terms.
The tender is severely incomplete due to the complete absence of any attached documents. Essential information such as detailed specifications, terms and conditions, full evaluation criteria, and instructions for tenderers are missing, making it impossible for potential bidders to prepare a comprehensive and compliant submission.
The lack of detailed information, particularly regarding evaluation criteria and financial requirements, creates an uneven playing field. Without clear and comprehensive documentation, potential bidders cannot fully understand the expectations or how their submissions will be assessed, potentially disadvantaging smaller or less experienced firms.
The tender's current state, with no attached documents, makes it impractical for potential suppliers to respond effectively. The stated contract duration of 1 month for a DPS is highly unusual and impractical for a system designed for long-term, recurring services.
There is a significant inconsistency between the stated 'Type: Restricted' and the explicit objective of establishing a 'Dynamic Purchasing System'. While a DPS can be established via a restricted procedure, the primary classification should reflect the DPS nature. Furthermore, the 'Contract Duration' of 1 month for a DPS is inconsistent with the typical long-term nature of such systems.
The provided information does not include any specific requirements or considerations related to environmental, social, or economic sustainability criteria.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Loading competitor predictions...
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required