Security and Information Risk Advisor (SIRA) services

This tender is critically flawed due to the complete unavailability of all associated tender documents, rendering it unbiddable and non-compliant with fundamental procurement principles. While basic information is present, the absence of essential documentation severely undermines legal compliance, clarity, completeness, fairness, and practicality.

The tender fails to meet mandatory disclosure requirements as all 13 listed documents, including one marked as 'Required,' are inaccessible ('Page not found'). This is a severe breach of procurement regulations, especially given a previous tender for this opportunity was withdrawn for similar reasons.

While the basic description of services and AI-extracted requirements offer some initial understanding, the complete absence of detailed tender documents means that comprehensive requirements, specifications, and crucial evaluation criteria are entirely missing, making it impossible for suppliers to understand the full scope or how their bids will be assessed.

Despite the presence of basic tender metadata (title, reference, organization, value, deadlines), the tender is fundamentally incomplete as all 13 associated documents, which would contain the detailed instructions, specifications, and forms necessary for submission, are unavailable.

The complete lack of access to tender documents and the absence of specified evaluation criteria create an inherently unfair procurement process. Potential bidders cannot prepare a compliant or competitive offer, undermining the principles of equal treatment and transparency. The lack of e-submission further limits accessibility.

The tender is practically unworkable as suppliers cannot access any of the necessary bidding documents. While a contract start date and duration are provided, the inability to obtain tender materials or submit electronically makes participation impossible.

The structured basic information provided (title, reference, organization, financial details, timeline, classification) is internally consistent and logically presented. The inconsistency lies in the *availability* of the linked documents rather than the data fields themselves.

The tender does not indicate any focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.