Legal Compliance50/100
The tender correctly defines the procedure type and CPV codes. However, it critically lacks explicit mention of mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and financial requirements, which are fundamental for legal compliance and transparency. The absence of a clear reveal date is also a minor concern.
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
•Missing eligibility requirements
Clarity60/100
The description of services and the division into lots is clear and unambiguous, and technical capability requirements are well-defined. However, the tender significantly lacks specified evaluation criteria, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed. Performance conditions are also not fully detailed in the provided summary.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Performance conditions not fully detailed
Completeness50/100
Basic information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, and duration are provided. However, the tender is significantly incomplete due to the explicit absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, financial requirements, and, most critically, evaluation criteria. The listed documents are general and do not confirm the presence of these essential details.
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
•Missing eligibility requirements
Fairness40/100
The tender discloses the estimated value and provides a reasonable submission period. However, the absence of clear and objective evaluation criteria severely compromises fairness, as bidders cannot understand the basis of award. The lack of electronic submission also creates barriers to equal access, and the absence of explicit eligibility and financial requirements could lead to an uneven playing field.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No electronic submission supported
Practicality50/100
The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the lack of support for electronic submission is a significant practical drawback for bidders in modern procurement. While documents are stated as 'available,' a direct URL for tender documents is not explicitly provided in the summary.
•No electronic submission supported
•No explicit document URL provided
Data Consistency80/100
The core data points such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, and CPV code are consistent and logical. There are no indications of disputes or suspensions. Minor omissions include the 'Liable Person' and specific codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure'.
•Missing liable person
•Missing type/procedure codes
Sustainability20/100
The tender does not include any explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, representing a missed opportunity to integrate broader public value objectives.
•No green procurement aspects
•No social criteria