Development of a construction project and author supervision for the object “Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and improvement of energy efficiency in the Ķekava Municipality Police building in Ķekava, Ķekava Municipality”

This tender presents a clear project objective and utilizes an open e-procurement procedure, but is significantly hampered by restricted document access and notable data inconsistencies.

The tender correctly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and the submission deadline is reasonable. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a severe concern, potentially undermining compliance with transparency and equal treatment principles mandated by procurement regulations.

The tender's title, description, and AI-extracted requirements are generally clear. While evaluation criteria are stated to be detailed in a document, the 'Missing evaluation criteria' flag suggests they are not immediately obvious or clearly presented in the main notice, impacting overall clarity.

Basic information, financial details, timeline, and classification are provided. However, the 'Restricted document access' and the 'Required: No' status for all tender documents mean the complete tender package is not fully available to bidders, which is a critical deficiency.

The tender benefits from being an open procedure and utilizing e-procurement, with a disclosed estimated value and reasonable deadlines. Nevertheless, 'Restricted document access' is a severe impediment to fairness, preventing all potential bidders from having equal access to essential information.

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration and EU funding are specified. However, the lack of a clear document URL (or the 'restricted access' issue) and the absence of a contract start date reduce the practicality for bidders in preparing and submitting a comprehensive bid.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, significant internal contradictions exist, such as 'E-Procurement' characteristic versus 'No e-submission' automated check, and 'Restricted document access' versus AI summaries of document content. The 'Missing evaluation criteria' flag also contradicts the AI summary of Document 5.

The project's core objective is highly sustainable (energy efficiency and GHG reduction), which is a strong positive. It is also EU-funded, often implying higher sustainability standards. However, the tender documentation does not explicitly include broader green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation requirements for the bidder's approach or company practices beyond the project's inherent environmental goal.