Multi-Disciplinary Consultants Team

This tender is critically incomplete due to the absence of essential tender documents and evaluation criteria, severely hindering fair competition and practical bid preparation. While basic information is present, the lack of detailed requirements and assessment methods raises significant concerns regarding transparency and fairness.

The tender uses an Open procedure, which is generally compliant. However, the explicit absence of specific mandatory exclusion grounds and, critically, the complete lack of evaluation criteria are major legal compliance deficiencies. The absence of any tender documents makes it impossible to assess full legal compliance.

The tender's basic description is clear regarding the service type and locations. However, the requirements themselves are extremely high-level and vague, lacking the necessary detail for bidders to understand the scope, expected deliverables, or how their proposals will be assessed.

This tender is fundamentally incomplete. The most critical issue is the complete absence of any attached tender documents, which are essential for bidders to prepare a comprehensive and compliant offer. Key information such as detailed scope, terms and conditions, and evaluation criteria are entirely missing.

The extreme lack of detail, particularly the absence of tender documents and evaluation criteria, creates a significant risk to fairness. Bidders cannot prepare competitive offers without clear guidance, potentially favoring an incumbent or pre-selected supplier through subjective evaluation.

From a bidder's perspective, preparing a meaningful and competitive bid for this tender is highly impractical. Without detailed scope, terms, and evaluation criteria, bidders cannot accurately estimate resources, costs, or propose a tailored solution.

A notable inconsistency exists regarding the contract duration. The estimated value is presented in two currencies, which is acceptable if the primary currency for bidding is clear.

The tender does not include any specific green procurement, social, or innovation criteria, indicating a lack of focus on sustainability aspects in the procurement process.