Development of construction design documentation, author supervision, and construction works for the classified section at Talejas Street 1, Riga

This tender presents a structured procurement for construction works but is significantly hampered by restricted document access, undisclosed estimated value, and several data inconsistencies, impacting fairness and transparency.

The tender generally adheres to legal frameworks with a clear procedure, appropriate CPV, and reasonable submission period. However, the non-disclosure of the estimated value, despite not being classified, represents a notable transparency deficit that could be a legal compliance concern.

The project description is clear, and AI-extracted requirements are well-structured. However, the 'Restricted document access' issue fundamentally impedes bidders' ability to fully understand the detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, despite document summaries indicating their presence.

Basic information, deadlines, duration, and location are provided. Key documents are listed. The primary deficiency is the absence of the estimated contract value, which is crucial for bidders' strategic planning.

The tender's fairness is severely compromised by restricted document access, which creates an uneven playing field. The undisclosed estimated value further limits transparency, making it difficult for all potential bidders to assess the opportunity equitably.

Electronic submission is supported, and contract duration is specified. However, the restricted document access poses a significant practical barrier for potential bidders. The absence of a clear contract start date and specific financing details also reduces practicality.

While most basic fields are populated and dates are logical, there are several critical inconsistencies. These include the undisclosed value despite not being classified, conflicting information on e-submission and evaluation criteria, and the contradiction between 'documents available' and 'restricted document access.'

The tender lacks any explicit mention of green procurement, social considerations, or innovation aspects. It is also not EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.