Provision of electrician services for Aloja Amalgamated Municipality Administration and institutions located in its territory for 2026

This tender for electrician services exhibits significant quality concerns, primarily due to restricted document access, undisclosed value, and ambiguities regarding evaluation criteria, which severely impact fairness and transparency. While basic information is present, critical details are either missing or inaccessible.

The tender defines an open procedure, specifies a reasonable submission deadline, and uses appropriate CPV codes. However, the restricted document access and undisclosed estimated value raise significant concerns regarding transparency and compliance with best practices in public procurement.

The tender's title and description are clear, and requirements are structured by referencing specific documents. However, the flag indicating 'No evaluation criteria specified' (despite a document summary mentioning them) suggests a lack of clear, upfront presentation or easy accessibility, which diminishes overall clarity for bidders.

Most basic information, including organization, reference, description, deadlines, and duration, is provided. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission impacting the completeness of financial information. The full scope of requirements may also be incomplete without full document access.

Fairness is severely compromised by the 'Restricted document access,' which prevents equal access to critical tender information. The undisclosed estimated value hinders bidders' ability to assess the opportunity fairly, and the ambiguity surrounding evaluation criteria further undermines transparency and objectivity.

The practicality for bidders is significantly hampered by restricted document access, making it difficult to prepare a comprehensive and compliant bid. The contradiction between 'E-Procurement' being a characteristic and 'No e-submission' being flagged also creates uncertainty regarding the submission process.

While most dates are logical and no disputes are reported, there is a notable inconsistency between the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the 'No e-submission' flag. Additionally, the conflicting information regarding the presence of evaluation criteria (mentioned in a document summary but flagged as missing) indicates data consistency issues.

The tender does not explicitly include any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU-funded, indicating a neutral stance on sustainability integration.