Supply of pine and spruce seedlings for the needs of Talsi Municipality

This tender for pine and spruce seedlings exhibits significant deficiencies in legal compliance, fairness, and data consistency due to an incorrect CPV code, restricted document access, and missing evaluation criteria, which collectively hinder fair competition and transparency.

The tender suffers from a critical legal compliance issue due to the incorrect CPV code (3450000 - Vehicles and associated parts instead of forestry products), which misclassifies the procurement and could lead to improper advertising. Additionally, restricted document access raises concerns about adherence to transparency requirements.

While the general description of the procurement is clear, the tender critically lacks specified evaluation criteria. This omission makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed, significantly impacting the clarity of the bidding process.

The tender is incomplete as it fails to disclose the estimated value and the contract duration, which are crucial pieces of information for potential bidders. The absence of detailed evaluation criteria also contributes to its incompleteness.

Fairness is severely compromised by restricted document access and the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria, which prevents bidders from preparing competitive and compliant offers on an equal footing. The undisclosed estimated value further reduces transparency.

The practicality for bidders is reduced by the lack of information regarding the contract start date and duration, as well as the undisclosed estimated value. There is also a contradiction regarding e-submission, which could create confusion.

Data consistency is poor due to the critical error of assigning an incorrect CPV code (Vehicles instead of seedlings). Furthermore, there is a contradiction between the stated 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the automated check indicating 'No e-submission.' Key fields like estimated value and contract duration are also missing.

The tender does not include any explicit requirements or considerations related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, indicating a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.