Tenders

Gorsley Goffs Primary School - Window, Door and Rooflight Replacement and Bosbury CE Primary School - Window, Screen and Door Replacement

Open
Deadline
8 days left
March 11, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
012575-2026
Value
£318,000
Location
Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire, United Kingdom
Published
February 24, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 04, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 11, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 03, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£318,000
Duration
4 months
Location
Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire
Type
Other
58
Quality Score/100
Fair

Original Tender Description

Window, Door and Rooflight replacement at Gorsley Goffs Primary School and also Window, Screen and Door Replacement Bosbury CE Primary School.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Submit the tender by 2026-03-11 at 12:00:00 UTC.
--The bid must address the replacement of windows, doors, and rooflights at Gorsley Goffs Primary School.
--The bid must address the replacement of windows, screens, and doors at Bosbury CE Primary School.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds were detailed in the provided tender information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific eligibility requirements were detailed in the provided tender information.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific technical capability requirements were detailed in the provided tender information.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements were detailed in the provided tender information.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
012575-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS record provides structured data detailing a tender for window, door, and rooflight replacement at Gorsley Goffs Primary School and window, screen, and door replacement at Bosbury CE Primary School, issued by Herefordshire Council.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
012575-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS Release Package provides structured data about a construction tender by Herefordshire Council for window, door, and rooflight replacement projects at Gorsley Goffs and Bosbury CE Primary Schools.

Official PDF VersionPDF
012575-2026_official.pdf

This notice outlines an open tender by Herefordshire Council for window, door, and rooflight replacement at Gorsley Goffs and Bosbury CE Primary Schools, with an estimated value of £265,000 excluding VAT and a tender submission deadline of 11 March 2026.

Tender NoticeHTM
012575-2026.html

This tender seeks contractors for window, door, and rooflight replacement at Gorsley Goffs Primary School and window, screen, and door replacement at Bosbury CE Primary School, with an estimated value of £265,000.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

58
Fair

Tender Quality Score

This tender is administratively clear but suffers from significant deficiencies regarding the absence of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, which undermines transparency and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

While the basic procedure type and deadlines are defined, the critical absence of detailed mandatory exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements presents a compliance risk, even for a below-threshold procedure.

Lack of detailed mandatory exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements.
Clarity40/100

The project description is clear, but the tender's requirements and evaluation criteria are severely lacking, making it highly unclear for potential bidders what they need to submit to be successful and how their bids will be judged.

Absence of detailed submission requirements beyond scope.
Missing evaluation criteria.
Completeness50/100

Basic administrative and financial information is present, but critical details such as specific eligibility, technical, and financial requirements, along with evaluation criteria, are missing, which are fundamental components of complete tender documentation.

Missing specific eligibility, technical, and financial requirements.
Missing evaluation criteria.
Fairness55/100

The value is disclosed, documents are accessible, and the submission deadline is reasonable. However, the absence of evaluation criteria and the lack of e-submission significantly compromise transparency and equal access for bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria, leading to potential subjectivity.
No electronic submission option.
Practicality65/100

Contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the absence of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement processes.

No electronic submission supported.
Data Consistency85/100

Key fields are mostly populated, and dates are logical. Minor inconsistencies include empty fields for 'Liable Person' and procedure codes, and a slight discrepancy in the estimated value between EUR and GBP in document summaries.

Some key fields (e.g., 'Liable Person', procedure codes) are unpopulated.
Minor discrepancy in estimated value between main data (EUR) and document summaries (GBP).
Sustainability20/100

The tender shows no indication of incorporating green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, representing a missed opportunity for value-added procurement in line with modern standards.

No green procurement criteria.
No social aspects included.

Strengths

Clear project description and scope.
All basic administrative and financial information is provided.
CPV code is correctly assigned.
Documents are available for review.
Reasonable submission deadline (28 days).

Concerns

Critical lack of detailed requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial).
Missing evaluation criteria, hindering transparency and fairness.
No electronic submission option, impacting accessibility.
Absence of sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Incomplete data fields for some administrative details.

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish detailed mandatory exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements.
2. Specify clear, objective, and weighted evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fair assessment.
3. Implement an electronic submission system to streamline the process and enhance accessibility for bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline