Legal Compliance50/100
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly, and the submission period is reasonable. However, the explicit lack of mandatory exclusion/eligibility grounds in the AI summary and the 'Page not found' errors for the 'Tender Letter' and 'Tender Questionnaire' are significant legal compliance issues, as these documents typically contain essential legal terms and conditions.
•Missing explicit mandatory exclusion/eligibility grounds
•Critical tender documents (Tender Letter, Tender Questionnaire) are unavailable
Clarity60/100
The project description and technical requirements are clearly articulated, detailing the scope, aesthetic preferences, and specific standards (ROSPA, BSEN). However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major deficiency, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness55/100
Basic information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, duration, and location are well-provided. Nevertheless, the tender is incomplete due to the unavailability of key documents ('Tender Letter', 'Tender Questionnaire') and the critical omission of evaluation criteria.
•Critical tender documents (Tender Letter, Tender Questionnaire) are unavailable
•No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness45/100
While the estimated value is disclosed and the requirements do not appear tailored, the lack of full document access and the absence of transparent evaluation criteria severely compromise the fairness of the procurement process. The absence of e-submission also creates an unnecessary barrier.
•No full document access
•No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality50/100
The contract start date, duration, and budget are clearly stated, which aids planning. However, the practical execution for bidders is hindered by the lack of electronic submission capabilities and the inability to access essential tender documents due to 'Page not found' errors.
•No e-submission
•Critical tender documents are unavailable
Data Consistency75/100
Most key fields are populated, and there are no reported disputes. However, there is a notable inconsistency between the stated 'Contract Duration: 2 months' and the 'October 2026 installation' timeline, given a contract start date of 2026-06-30. This suggests a potential misstatement of either duration or installation schedule.
•Inconsistency between stated contract duration and installation timeline
Sustainability80/100
The tender demonstrates a strong commitment to sustainability by specifying 'natural look equipment,' promoting natural shading, and requiring the retention of an existing tree. It also includes important social aspects by mandating 'DDA compliant inclusive play equipment.' There is no explicit focus on innovation or EU funding.
•No explicit innovation focus
•Not EU funded