Legal Compliance75/100
The tender clearly states it is a 'Market Engagement Opportunity, not a Tender Opportunity,' which correctly exempts it from full tender legal compliance requirements. The CPV code is appropriate. However, the 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are listed as 'None,' which is a data quality issue for the record itself.
•Missing 'Type' and 'Procedure' codes for the record.
Clarity80/100
The description is exceptionally clear, explicitly stating the nature of the opportunity and its objectives. AI-extracted requirements are well-defined and appropriately differentiate from formal tender requirements, enhancing overall clarity.
Completeness70/100
Basic information like title, reference, organization, description, and deadlines are present. Duration and contract start date are specified. However, 'Type,' 'Procedure,' and 'Liable Person' fields are missing, and the estimated value is classified, impacting overall completeness of the record.
•Missing 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields.
•Missing 'Liable Person' information.
Fairness85/100
The requirements for participation are generic and not tailored to a specific company, promoting fair access. While the value is classified, this is less of a fairness concern for a market engagement. The lack of e-submission is a minor drawback for equal access.
•No e-submission option, potentially limiting equal access for some participants.
Practicality65/100
The primary practical concern is the absence of electronic submission, which is a significant limitation in modern procurement practices. Other practical details like contract duration and start date are clearly specified.
•No electronic submission supported.
Data Consistency90/100
The information provided is largely consistent, with dates being logical and no disputes or suspensions noted. The explicit declaration of 'Market Engagement' is consistent across the document. Missing fields are noted under completeness, but existing data is consistent.
Sustainability50/100
The core purpose of this market engagement is highly focused on social aspects, specifically supporting children and young people with disabilities, which is a significant positive. However, there is no mention of green procurement or innovation focus.
•No explicit green procurement criteria.
•No explicit innovation focus.