Restoration of the state-significant watercourse Starica, land reclamation cadastral code 42672:01, pk.00/00-86/60 in Nautrēni parish, Rēzekne municipality

This tender demonstrates good foundational compliance and clarity regarding its core requirements, but is significantly hampered by concerns over document accessibility and internal data inconsistencies, impacting fairness and overall completeness.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a reasonable submission deadline, clearly defined open procedure, and appropriate CPV code. Its EU-funded and WTO/GPA characteristics indicate broader regulatory compliance. Mandatory exclusion grounds are referenced, contributing to a robust legal framework.

The project description is clear, and requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities are well-referenced to specific documents. Evaluation criteria (price and duration) are stated in the document summary, providing a clear basis for bid assessment, despite conflicting automated flags.

Most essential information, including title, organization, financial details, and timeline, is provided. Requirements and criteria are referenced to specific documents. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag is a significant concern, potentially hindering bidders from accessing all necessary information for a complete submission.

The tender's fairness is severely impacted by the 'Restricted document access' flag, which could create an uneven playing field. While the estimated value is disclosed, deadlines are reasonable, and evaluation criteria appear objective (price and duration), the potential lack of full document access is a critical barrier to equal opportunity.

Electronic submission is indicated by 'E-Procurement' and the 'Opening Place' in the electronic system, despite a conflicting automated flag. While a specific contract start date is not provided, the duration being a bidder-proposed evaluation criterion is common for works. EU funding information is available.

The tender exhibits notable inconsistencies across various data points. Contradictions exist regarding the specification of evaluation criteria, the availability of e-submission, and the nature of document access, leading to potential confusion and undermining the reliability of the presented information.

Despite being EU-funded, the tender explicitly lacks specific criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This indicates a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability objectives into the procurement process.