Laundry and dry cleaning services for the needs of Augšdaugava Municipality institutions

This tender for laundry and dry cleaning services presents a mixed quality assessment, demonstrating good structural elements but suffering from critical issues regarding transparency, data consistency, and practical accessibility. Key concerns include undisclosed value and contradictory information on e-submission and evaluation criteria.

The tender defines the procedure and CPV codes clearly, and the submission deadline is reasonable. However, the estimated value is not disclosed despite being unclassified, and there are flags for restricted document access, which are significant legal transparency concerns.

The tender description is clear, and requirements are detailed across multiple documents. While AI-extracted content specifies 'lowest price' as the evaluation criterion, an automated check flags missing evaluation criteria, indicating a minor inconsistency in presentation.

Basic information, duration, and location are well-provided. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for bidders to properly assess the opportunity.

Fairness is significantly compromised by the undisclosed estimated value and flagged restricted document access. While the 'lowest price' evaluation criterion is objective, the lack of full transparency and potential issues with e-submission (contradictory information) hinder equal access and fair competition.

The tender's practicality is hampered by conflicting information regarding e-procurement/e-submission. If e-submission is not truly supported, it creates a significant barrier. The absence of a specific contract start date and financing details also reduces practical clarity for bidders.

The tender exhibits notable data consistency issues, with direct contradictions on critical fields such as the disclosure of the estimated value (not classified but not disclosed), the availability of e-submission, and the specification of evaluation criteria.

The tender lacks any explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, suggesting a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability principles.