Student Recruitment Marketing Agency Framework

This tender for a student recruitment marketing framework shows moderate quality, with clear service descriptions but significant deficiencies in legal compliance, completeness, and fairness due to missing critical information like procedure type, evaluation criteria, and full tender documents.

The tender lacks a clearly defined procedure type and explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, which are fundamental for legal compliance. The absence of a reveal date makes it difficult to fully assess the reasonableness of the 14-day submission window for a complex framework. While CPV codes are correct and no disputes are noted, these omissions present notable compliance risks.

The description of services and AI-extracted requirements are generally clear and understandable. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major clarity deficiency, preventing potential bidders from understanding how their proposals will be assessed. Performance conditions are also not fully detailed.

While basic information, estimated value, duration, and location are provided, the tender is significantly incomplete. Key missing elements include the procedure type, explicit evaluation criteria, and what appears to be the full tender documentation (as only summaries marked 'Required: No' are available). The missing reveal date also contributes to incompleteness.

Fairness is significantly compromised by the complete absence of evaluation criteria, which are essential for transparent and objective assessment. The requirement for 'proven higher education experience' could be seen as restrictive, potentially limiting competition. Furthermore, the lack of e-submission and potentially short preparation time for a complex framework raise concerns about equal access and opportunity.

The tender's practicality is hindered by the lack of support for electronic submission and the absence of a direct document URL, which are standard expectations in modern procurement. While the contract start date and duration are clearly specified, these omissions create unnecessary barriers for potential bidders.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, the 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are empty, and the 'Liable Person' is not specified. The 'planning' status, despite having a firm submission deadline, introduces a minor inconsistency in the process stage.

The tender mentions a general 'commitment to innovation' for framework partners, which is a positive aspect. However, it explicitly lacks specific green procurement criteria or social aspects, which are increasingly important for public tenders and reflect a broader commitment to sustainability.