Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login17 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
4 documents available with AI summaries
This document is an official OCDS data record providing a transparent overview of the procurement process, including details of the buyer (The Mayor and Commonalty and Citizens of the City of London) and the tender's initiation.
This OCDS data package provides structured information about the tender for the development of the City of London Mounted Unit's facilities at 52 Aldgate High Street, detailing the contracting authority and the initial planning phase of the project.
This document is an amendment notice for the City of London Police Mounted Unit's MEP consultancy tender at 52 Aldgate High Street, removing vetting requirements and updating the submission deadline to 4th March 2026.
This tender notice announces an amendment to the procurement for construction consultancy services for the City of London Police Mounted Unit's new facility at 52 Aldgate High Street, removing previously required vetting conditions (NPPV Level 3 and SC) and revising the submission deadline to 4th March 2026.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for construction consultancy services provides a clear project description but suffers from critical omissions regarding evaluation criteria and the lack of electronic submission, significantly impacting clarity, completeness, and fairness.
The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV code. The submission period from the current date (28 days) is reasonable for an open procedure, especially considering it's an amendment. The removal of previously required vetting conditions is a positive adjustment. The absence of a specific tender reveal date is a minor transparency concern.
While the project description is detailed and the AI-extracted requirements are well-defined, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it impossible for bidders to clearly understand how their proposals will be assessed, which is a major deficiency.
Essential information such as title, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are present. However, the tender is significantly incomplete due to the lack of detailed evaluation criteria. The 'full MEP scope' is referenced but not provided in the summary, indicating further details are external.
The open procedure type and the removal of restrictive vetting requirements enhance potential participation and promote broader access. Nevertheless, the critical absence of objective and transparent evaluation criteria, coupled with the lack of e-submission, severely compromises the fairness and equal treatment of bidders.
The absence of electronic submission support is a significant practical impediment in contemporary public procurement, increasing administrative burden for bidders. Document URLs are not explicitly provided, though documents are listed as available.
The core data fields are consistently populated, and dates (submission, contract start, duration) are logical and coherent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data integrity. Minor empty codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure' are negligible.
The tender does not incorporate any explicit green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria. This indicates a missed opportunity to promote sustainable practices and align with modern procurement best practices.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required