Legal Compliance75/100
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code appropriately. However, the explicit absence of mandatory exclusion grounds and specific financial requirements for bidders, as noted in the AI-extracted requirements, represents a notable gap in legal compliance and disclosure. The missing reveal date is also a minor concern.
•Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds
•Missing explicit financial requirements for bidders
Clarity60/100
The project and technical requirements are clearly described and understandable. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major flaw, preventing bidders from understanding how their proposals will be assessed and significantly reducing overall clarity.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100
Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and deadlines are well-provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the explicit lack of evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion grounds, and specific financial requirements for bidders. The mention of 'Divided into Parts' without further detail also indicates incompleteness.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds
Fairness65/100
The absence of evaluation criteria is a significant fairness concern, as it hinders objective assessment and transparency. The lack of electronic submission also presents a barrier to equal access and efficiency. While technical requirements are specific, they appear functional rather than tailored.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No electronic submission (e-submission)
Practicality65/100
Key practical details like contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the noted absence of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders.
•No electronic submission (e-submission)
Data Consistency90/100
The tender data is largely consistent, with key fields populated and no disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include empty fields for 'Liable Person' and procedure codes, and the lack of detail for 'Divided into Parts'.
•Empty 'Liable Person' field
•Empty codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure'
Sustainability50/100
The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria within its requirements or evaluation framework. While the underlying project is innovative, the tender itself does not seek or reward sustainable or innovative solutions from bidders.
•No explicit green procurement criteria
•No explicit social criteria