Legal Compliance65/100
The tender is a Preliminary Market Engagement (PME) notice, which is a valid market engagement tool. However, the structured data is incomplete, with 'Type' and 'Procedure' listed as 'None' and a 'Missing reveal date'. While a PME doesn't require full formal tender compliance, basic data quality and transparency are expected.
•Procedure type not clearly defined in structured data
•Missing reveal date for the PME notice
Clarity85/100
The description is highly detailed and provides excellent context regarding the service redesign, patient numbers, and geographical split. The AI-extracted requirements are clear and well-defined for a PME, explicitly stating what is not yet detailed (e.g., eligibility, financial, evaluation criteria).
Completeness60/100
While basic information like title, reference, organization, and deadlines are present, the estimated value is not disclosed and classified, which is a significant omission. Key structured fields like 'Type', 'Procedure', and 'Liable Person' are also unpopulated.
•Estimated value not disclosed
•Missing procedure type and liable person in structured data
Fairness70/100
The undisclosed and classified estimated value significantly hinders fairness, as potential suppliers cannot adequately assess the opportunity's scale. The automated check flags 'No e-submission', which could pose a barrier to equal access if it applies to PME responses. Requirements appear generic and not tailored.
•Estimated value is classified and not disclosed
•Potential lack of e-submission for PME responses (as flagged by automated check)
Practicality60/100
The classified estimated value impacts suppliers' ability to practically assess resource allocation. The 'No e-submission' flag, if applicable to PME responses, would create practical hurdles. While a CfT reference is provided, a direct document URL is not explicitly stated.
•Estimated value not disclosed, impacting practical assessment
•No explicit e-submission support (as flagged by automated check)
Data Consistency55/100
Several key structured fields, including 'Type', 'Procedure', 'Liable Person', and 'Estimated Value', are either empty or marked as 'None'/'Not disclosed'. While dates are logical, the overall data consistency in the structured information is poor.
•Inconsistent population of key structured data fields (Type, Procedure, Liable Person, Estimated Value)
Sustainability30/100
There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the tender description or requirements. This indicates a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability criteria.
•No explicit green procurement criteria
•No explicit social criteria