Class 158 Transition and Redelivery Maintenance

This tender provides essential project details but suffers from significant gaps in clarity, completeness, and fairness, particularly regarding evaluation criteria and detailed requirements.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code appropriately and has no disputes. However, the absence of a reveal date and the lack of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements are notable omissions, impacting full legal transparency.

While the project description is clear, the tender severely lacks specific details for eligibility, financial, and technical requirements. Crucially, evaluation criteria are not specified, making it difficult for bidders to understand how proposals will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and location are provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of detailed eligibility, financial, and evaluation criteria. The inclusion of an irrelevant document (Document 1) also detracts from overall completeness.

Full document access and value disclosure contribute positively to fairness. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria significantly undermines transparency and objectivity. The lack of e-submission also creates a barrier to equal access and modern procurement practices.

The tender provides essential practical information such as contract start date, duration, and estimated value. However, the absence of electronic submission capabilities is a significant practical drawback for potential bidders.

Key dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Most essential fields are populated, contributing to good data consistency, although some minor fields like 'Liable Person' are empty.

The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. It is not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.