Fuel procurement for the needs of Kalna, Leimaņi, Zasas, Rubene parishes of Jēkabpils municipality

This tender exhibits significant transparency and fairness issues due to restricted document access and undisclosed value, despite clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. Key improvements are needed in accessibility and information disclosure.

Legal compliance is severely impacted by the 'Restricted document access' and 'Value not disclosed' issues, which undermine fundamental principles of transparency and equal treatment in public procurement. While the procedure type is clear and deadlines are reasonable, these omissions are critical.

The tender description is clear, and AI-extracted requirements are well-defined and understandable. Based on the AI summaries of the 'Nolikums' and 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības' documents, evaluation criteria are specified, contributing to good clarity.

While basic information, deadlines, duration, and document references are provided, the 'Estimated Value: Not disclosed' is a significant omission that impacts the overall completeness of the tender information.

Fairness is critically compromised by 'Restricted document access' and the 'Estimated Value: Not disclosed'. These issues prevent equal access to information and hinder bidders' ability to make informed decisions, creating an uneven playing field.

Despite supporting electronic submission, the 'Restricted document access' makes practical participation impossible for potential bidders. The absence of a specific contract start date and detailed financing information also slightly reduces practicality.

There are inconsistencies between the 'Issues/Flags' and 'Automated Check Results' (e.g., 'No evaluation criteria specified', 'No e-submission') and the AI summaries of the documents or explicit characteristics. The missing estimated value also contributes to inconsistency.

The tender does not include any explicit requirements or considerations for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, nor is it indicated as EU-funded, resulting in a very low sustainability score.