Framework agreement for the acquisition of professional household appliances for Dienvidkurzeme Municipality institutions

This tender demonstrates good foundational elements with clear basic information and structured requirements, but is significantly hampered by issues related to document accessibility, e-submission capabilities, and a complete lack of sustainability considerations.

The tender generally adheres to legal requirements, with a clearly defined open procedure, appropriate CPV codes, and reasonable submission timelines. Mandatory exclusion grounds are referenced. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag raises concerns about full compliance with transparency obligations, potentially hindering bidders' ability to review all legal texts.

The tender description is clear, and AI-extracted requirements are well-structured, categorizing mandatory, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission criteria. The summaries indicate that detailed requirements and evaluation criteria are available in the attached documents, particularly 'Nolikums' and 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības'.

The tender provides comprehensive basic information, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and classification codes. All five required documents are listed with content summaries, indicating that essential information is present or referenced within the tender package.

Fairness is significantly compromised by the 'Restricted document access' flag, which can create an uneven playing field for bidders. Furthermore, the contradiction between 'E-Procurement' and 'No e-submission' suggests a lack of equal access and increased administrative burden for participants. The requirements themselves do not appear tailored.

Practicality is low due to the 'No e-submission' issue, which implies bidders cannot submit electronically, increasing administrative effort. The absence of direct document URLs (implied by 'Restricted document access') also makes it less practical for potential bidders to efficiently access and review all necessary tender documents.

Most key fields are populated consistently, and dates are logical. However, there is a notable inconsistency between the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the 'No e-submission' automated check. While the document summary indicates evaluation criteria are present, the automated flag 'Missing evaluation criteria' also points to a potential data representation issue.

The tender scores very low on sustainability as it explicitly lacks any identified green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.