Services-Framework-Debt Collection

This tender, currently in the planning stage, provides a clear service description but suffers from significant deficiencies in transparency and completeness, notably the classified value, absence of evaluation criteria, and inaccessible documentation.

The tender's legal compliance is moderate. While the CPV code is appropriate and no disputes are reported, the classified estimated value is a significant transparency concern for a regulated utility. The missing reveal date prevents a full assessment of deadline reasonableness from initial publication.

The service description and basic requirements are clear and unambiguous. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria and explicit performance conditions significantly hinders clarity for potential bidders, making it difficult to formulate a competitive proposal.

The tender is notably incomplete. Key information such as the estimated value and evaluation criteria are missing. Furthermore, two out of five listed tender documents are inaccessible or failed to download, indicating a significant gap in provided documentation.

Fairness is significantly compromised. The classified value, absence of evaluation criteria, and lack of e-submission create substantial barriers to transparent and equal competition. Inaccessible documents further exacerbate these issues, preventing all bidders from having equal access to information.

Practicality is low due to several factors. The lack of electronic submission capabilities can complicate the bidding process for many suppliers. Additionally, the classified estimated value and issues with document accessibility pose practical hurdles for bidders in assessing the opportunity and preparing their submissions.

Data consistency is generally good, with most key fields populated and dates appearing logical. Minor inconsistencies include empty fields for 'Liable Person' and specific codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure', but these do not critically impact the overall understanding of the tender.

The tender shows very low commitment to sustainability. There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the provided information. This indicates a missed opportunity to integrate broader public value considerations into the procurement process.