Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Design og konstruktion af hegn, port og adgangskontrolsystemer til politibygningen Rapla Savi 2

Åben
Frist
12 dage tilbage
April 16, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Byggeri
Reference
307972
Værdi
€91,395
Lokation
Estonia, Estland
Udgivet
Marts 26, 2026
CPV-kode
Evalueringskriterier
Bid price100%
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 26, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 09, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 16, 2026

Åbning af udbud

April 16, 2026

VinderchancePRO
🔒
Opgrader til Professional
Se din estimerede vinderchance baseret på historiske data.
Opgrader til Professionel →
OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
SektorsindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for sektorsindsigt
Se gennemsnitlige vinderpriser, konkurrenceniveauer og markedstrends.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
€91,395
Varighed
5 måneder
Lokation
Estonia
Type
Byggeri
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God
Markedsbenchmark
Gns. Vindende Pris
€524,963
Gns. Tilbud
4.7
Konkurrence
Medium
SMV Vindere
94%
5,932 udbud analyseret

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Savi 2 politibygningen er beliggende på en ejendom med et åbent område, som har et delvist omkredsende hegn, der ikke overholder sikkerhedskravene, og et adgangskontrolsystem. Adgang til ejendommen er fri, uden fysiske barrierer og adgangskontrol. Fraværet af hegn og portsystemer øger risikoen for uautoriseret adgang, hærværk og tyveri, derfor skal der implementeres passende kompenserende sikkerhedsforanstaltninger i overensstemmelse med gældende sikkerhedskrav. Udbuddets omfang omfatter design og konstruktion af et nyt hegn og nye portsystemer. Under arbejdet skal det eksisterende hegn afmonteres, og et nyt hegn og nye portsystemer skal leveres og installeres.
Elektronisk Afsendelse

Kør risikoanalyse

Identificer potentielle risici, uoverensstemmelser og advarselstegn på tværs af alle udbudsdokumenter. Få en detaljeret risikorapport med alvorlighedsgrader og anbefalinger til afhjælpning.

Log ind

Vinderstrategi

AI-drevet analyse af dette udbuds krav, muligheder og udfordringer. Få strategiske indsigter for at maksimere din vinderchance.

60%
Estimeret vinderchanceModerat match

This tender for the Rapla Savi 2 police building's fencing and gate systems is a price-driven procurement. Success hinges on submitting the lowest compliant bid while demonstrating robust technical capability and meeting all mandatory requirements. Focus on cost optimization and efficient project delivery to secure this contract.

Nøglebudskaber til at vinde

Cost-Effective Security Solution: Delivering a compliant and robust fencing and gate system at the most competitive price.

Proven Expertise in Security Infrastructure: Demonstrating a track record of successful fence and gate installations for critical facilities.

Streamlined Project Execution: Ensuring efficient design and construction within the 5-month timeframe.

Nøglemuligheder
Price-driven evaluation (100% weight) allows for a direct competitive advantage through aggressive pricing.
The 'or equivalent' clause provides flexibility in material and system selection, potentially allowing for cost savings.
The relatively short duration (5 months) suggests a need for efficient planning and execution, which can be highlighted.
Nøgleudfordringer
Intense price competition due to 100% price-based evaluation.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, identify all potential cost-saving measures without compromising quality or compliance, and consider a lean project execution plan.

Meeting all mandatory eligibility and technical requirements precisely.

Meticulously review all forms and documentation requirements. Ensure all reference projects and financial data are accurate and readily available. Assign dedicated resources to ensure full compliance.

The background check requirement for employees adds an administrative layer and potential delay if not managed proactively.

Identify key personnel early and initiate the background check process as soon as possible, ideally in parallel with bid preparation or immediately after award.

Ideel tilbudsgiverprofil
A construction or security systems company with proven experience in fence and gate installation, strong project management capabilities, and a highly competitive cost structure. The ideal bidder can demonstrate a track record of delivering similar projects on time and within budget, and possesses the necessary personnel for background checks.
Nøglekrav
Minimum annual net turnover of EUR 100,000 for the last three financial years.
Completion of at least two similar projects for fence and gate systems installation within the last 60 months.
Submission of a compliant bid based on the technical specification and draft contract.
Inclusion of a qualified project manager and site manager.
Lowest bid price for maximum score.
Background check for employees on site.
Nøgledifferentiatorer
Demonstrating a clear understanding of the 'or equivalent' clause to propose cost-effective yet compliant alternatives.
Presenting a highly efficient project plan that minimizes the 5-month duration, potentially offering early completion.
Highlighting a strong, experienced project and site management team with a proven track record in similar, security-sensitive projects.
Muligheder for social værdi
While not explicitly required, consider a brief mention of commitment to local employment or responsible waste management during demolition and construction, if feasible within cost constraints.
Fokusområder for tilbud
Bid price100.0%

Submit the absolute lowest compliant price. Conduct detailed costings, explore all value engineering opportunities, and ensure no unnecessary overheads are included. Leverage the 'or equivalent' clause strategically for cost savings.

Anbefalinger5
Aggressively Price the Bid
KritiskHøj indsats

Given the 100% price evaluation, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible compliant bid. Conduct detailed cost breakdowns, identify all potential cost-saving measures, and ensure all overheads are minimized. Explore the 'or equivalent' clause for material and system selection to reduce costs without compromising security or compliance.

Directly impacts the scoring and likelihood of winning.
Ensure Absolute Compliance with Forms and Documentation
KritiskHøj indsats

Meticulously review and complete all required forms (Form 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 if applicable) and ensure all supporting documentation for eligibility (turnover, references) is accurate, complete, and verifiable. Any minor error can lead to disqualification.

Prevents disqualification and ensures the bid is considered.
Proactively Plan for Employee Background Checks
HøjMedium indsats

Identify the key personnel who will be working on-site and initiate the background check process as early as possible. This will prevent delays and demonstrate preparedness.

Ensures smooth project commencement and avoids potential delays.
Highlight Project Management Efficiency
MediumLav indsats

While price is paramount, subtly highlight the experience and efficiency of the proposed project and site managers. Emphasize their ability to deliver the project within the 5-month timeframe, demonstrating reliability.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to execute, even if not directly scored.
Thoroughly Review Technical Specification and 'Or Equivalent'
MediumMedium indsats

Understand the technical specification deeply. Identify specific components or systems where 'or equivalent' can be applied to achieve cost savings without compromising the security or functional requirements of the police building. Document these proposed equivalents clearly.

Enables cost reduction and maintains compliance.
Konkurrencemæssig positionering
Position as the most cost-effective provider of a compliant and secure fencing and gate system. Emphasize a lean operational model that allows for aggressive pricing. Highlight a strong track record in similar installations to build trust despite the price focus.

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

17 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (9)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (3)
Teknisk (2)
Finansiel (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--Bidders must submit a bid that complies with the contracting authority's conditions.
--The bid must include a separation of trade secrets.
--Bidders must submit Form 2 (Declaration of participation in public procurement).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must prove they have no grounds for exclusion.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must have a minimum annual net turnover of EUR 100,000 for the last three financial years.
--Bidders must have completed at least two similar projects for fence and gate systems installation within the last 60 months.
--Background check will be performed on the successful bidder's employees before they are allowed on site.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender is for the design and construction of fencing, gate, and access control systems for the Rapla Savi 2 police building.
--The technical specification document is the basis for the works.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must have a minimum annual net turnover of EUR 100,000 for the last three financial years.
--The bid will be evaluated solely on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

11 dokumenter tilgængelige med AI-resuméer

VastavustingimusedPDF
307972_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.0 KB

Bidders must submit a bid that complies with the contracting authority's conditions, distinguishes business secrets, includes the application form 2, the cost table form 3, and engages a qualified project manager and site manager.

Vis
Vorm 1 – Kvalifitseerimistingimuste täitmise kinnitamiseks esitatavad andmedDOC
Vorm 1 – Kvalifitseerimistingimuste täitmise ... -- 26.5 KB

The bidder must provide data on their net turnover for the last three financial years and a list of reference contracts with contact details to prove fulfillment of qualification requirements.

Vis
Vorm 2 – Riigihankel osalemise avaldusDOC
Vorm 2 – Riigihankel osalemise avaldus.docx -- 17.9 KB

This form is an application to participate in the public procurement, where the bidder confirms compliance with the terms and conformity of the offer.

Vis
Vorm 3 – Pakkumuse maksumuse tabelXLS
Vorm 3 – Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel.xlsx -- 17.4 KB

The bidder must submit a detailed price table for the design and construction works, including the supply and installation of fencing, gate, and access control systems.

Vis
Vorm 4 – CVDOC
Vorm 4 – CV.docx -- 17.3 KB

The contracting authority requires the submission of Form 4, a CV template, to assess the qualifications of the project manager, site manager, and strong current specialist.

Vis
Vorm 8 – Ühise pakkumuse volikiriDOC
Vorm 8 – Ühise pakkumuse volikiri.docx -- 13.7 KB

This document is a power of attorney authorizing one company to represent a joint bid for the design and construction tender of the Rapla Savi 2 police building.

Vis
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307972_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids solely based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Vis
Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
307972_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 6.6 KB

Bidders must confirm they have no exclusion grounds, have a minimum net turnover of EUR 100,000 in each of the last three financial years, and have completed at least two similar fence and gate system installation projects in the last 60 months.

Vis
Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekDOC
Alusdokument pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek.do... -- 42.6 KB

This document outlines the proposal submission process, formatting, and presentation requirements for the public procurement 'Design and construction of fence, gate, and access control systems for Rapla Savi 2 police building', referencing the technical specification and draft contract.

Vis
Lepingu projektDOC
Lepingu projekt ehitus ETY_2025.docx -- 95.5 KB

This document is a draft construction works contract, outlining general and specific conditions, detailing contractor, client, and site information, as well as the contract execution timeline and warranty period.

Vis
Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Tehniline kirjeldus ehitustööd_2025.docx -- 308.6 KB

The contracting authority is seeking bids for the design and construction of fencing, gate, and access control systems for the Rapla Savi 2 police building, with the technical specification serving as the basis for the works.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning af Dokumenter

Tilmeld dig for at se dokumentresuméer og analyser

75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for fencing and gate systems at a police building is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process focused on cost. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on specific forms.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements for public procurement. Deadlines are reasonable, and the procedure is outlined. The CPV code is provided. No disputes are noted. The mention of 'or equivalent' for standards is a positive aspect for legal compliance and fairness.

Klarhed80/100

The description of the need for security fencing and gate systems is clear. Requirements for technical capability and submission are documented through various forms and summaries. The evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as cost-based.

Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the contract start date is not explicitly stated, and while financing is implied by the estimated value, explicit details are missing. The tender relies heavily on attached forms for completeness of bidder information.

Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is fair in that it allows for 'or equivalent' for standards, promoting broader participation. The evaluation is solely on cost, which is objective. E-submission and e-procurement are utilized. The value is disclosed. There are no obvious tailored requirements to specific companies.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are positive. However, the reliance on numerous specific forms (Form 1, 2, 3, 4, 8) for submission might add administrative burden. The contract duration is specified, but the contract start date is missing, impacting practical planning.

Contract start date missing.
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender valid period aligns with the submission and opening dates.

Bæredygtighed50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This category scores low due to the absence of these considerations.

No explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria.
Not indicated as EU funded.

Styrker

Clear description of project needs.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission.
Inclusion of 'or equivalent' for standards.

Bekymringer

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria.
Reliance on numerous specific submission forms.
Missing contract start date.

Anbefalinger

1. Incorporate sustainability criteria (e.g., material sourcing, waste management).
2. Consider simplifying the number of required forms if possible.
3. Specify the contract start date for better planning.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline