Brauchen Sie Hilfe von Ausschreibungsexperten? Sehen Sie unseren Service zur Angebotserstellung
Ausschreibungen

Fertilizers and plant protection products for RMK nurseries for 2026

Geschlossen

Einreichungsfrist abgelaufen

Die Einreichungsfrist für diese Ausschreibung ist abgelaufen und es werden keine weiteren Bewerbungen mehr angenommen. Die nachstehenden Informationen werden zu Referenzzwecken aufbewahrt.

Aktive Ausschreibungen durchsuchen
Frist
Abgelaufen
12. Februar 2026
Vertragsdetails
Kategorie
Lieferungen
Referenz
305367
Wert
€65,000
Standort
Estonia, Estland
Veröffentlicht
27. Januar 2026
CPV-Code
Zeitplan des Projekts

Ausschreibung veröffentlicht

27. Januar 2026

Frist für Fragen

5. Februar 2026

Angebotsfrist

12. Februar 2026

Öffnung der Angebote

12. Februar 2026

Vertragsbeginn

4. März 2026

ErfolgswahrscheinlichkeitPRO
🔒
Upgrade auf Professional
Sehen Sie Ihre geschätzte Erfolgswahrscheinlichkeit basierend auf historischen Daten.
Upgrade auf Professional →
BieterinformationenPRO
🔒
Bieterinformationen freischalten
Sehen Sie Ausgabenmuster, bevorzugte Verfahren und mehr.
Upgrade auf Professional →
BrancheneinblickePRO
🔒
Brancheneinblicke freischalten
Sehen Sie durchschnittliche Zuschlagspreise, Wettbewerbsniveaus und Markttrends.
Upgrade auf Professional →
Budget
€65,000
Dauer
Nicht angegeben
Standort
Estonia
Typ
Lieferungen
75
Qualitätsbewertung/100
Gut
Marktvergleich
Durchschn. Zuschlagspreis
€40,562
Durchschn. Angebote
1.9
Wettbewerb
Gering
KMU-Gewinner
66%
128 analysierte Ausschreibungen

Ursprüngliche Ausschreibungsbeschreibung

Ostetakse erinevaid väetisi ja taimekaitsevahendeid koos tarnega.
Elektronische Einreichung

Risikoanalyse durchführen

Identifizieren Sie potenzielle Risiken, Inkonsistenzen und Warnsignale in allen Ausschreibungsdokumenten. Erhalten Sie einen detaillierten Risikobericht mit Schweregraden und Empfehlungen zur Risikominderung.

Anmelden

Erfolgsstrategie

Erhalten Sie eine KI-gestützte Gewinnstrategie, die auf diese Ausschreibung zugeschnitten ist. Beinhaltet Gewinnwahrscheinlichkeits-Score, wichtige Chancen und Herausforderungen, empfohlene Schwerpunkte für Angebote, Einblicke in die Wettbewerbspositionierung und umsetzbare Empfehlungen zur Maximierung Ihrer Chancen.

Anmelden

Wettbewerber

Upgrade, um zu sehen, welche Unternehmen wahrscheinlich auf diese Ausschreibung bieten werden, basierend auf historischen Beschaffungsdaten.

Anmelden

Anforderungen & Qualifikationen

17 Anforderungen in 5 Kategorien

Einreichung (6)
Verpflichtend (1)
Konformität (2)
Technisch (6)
Finanziell (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Submit a bid in an open procurement procedure.
--Submit a power of attorney if submitting a joint bid.
--Submit data for the offered fertilizers and plant protection products.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Comply with the exclusion conditions established by the contracting authority (specific conditions are detailed in the ESPD, which is for information).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Comply with the qualification conditions established by the contracting authority (specific conditions are detailed in the ESPD, which is for information).
--The bid must meet the requirements for submission.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Offer fertilizers and plant protection products for RMK nurseries for the year 2026.
--Offered products must comply with the technical specifications, including product names, quantities, and packaging requirements, as detailed in Annex 1 (Technical Description).
--Offered products must be intended for RMK nurseries.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bid must include the total cost of the offer.
--The total cost of the offer is the sole evaluation criterion (100% weight, lowest is best).

Vorschau der Anforderungen

Registrieren Sie sich, um vollständige Anforderungen und Analysen anzuzeigen

Dokumente

6 Dokumente mit KI-Zusammenfassungen verfügbar

VastavustingimusedPDF
305367_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 8.1 KB

This document specifies tender submission requirements, including power of attorney for joint bids, detailed data for offered fertilizers and plant protection products, and confirmation of overall bid compliance.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305367_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 5.7 KB

This document details the tender evaluation criteria, where the sole criterion is the total cost of the offer (100% weight, lowest is best), and lists the required fertilizers and plant protection products with their quantities.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305367_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 63.0 KB

This document is an explanatory procurement pass (ESPD) detailing the contracting authority's exclusion grounds and qualification conditions for the procurement of fertilizers and plant protection products, but it is for informational purposes only and not for submission.

HankedokumentDOC
Hankedokument.docx -- 22.8 KB

This tender document invites bids for fertilizers and plant protection products for RMK nurseries for 2026 in an open procurement procedure, describing general conditions, the subject of the framework agreement, and the estimated cost.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus Väetised ja tkv 20... -- 32.0 KB

This document details the technical specifications for fertilizers and plant protection products required by RMK nurseries for 2026, including product names, quantities, packaging requirements, and delivery terms under a framework agreement.

Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 Raamlepingu projekt .docx -- 30.5 KB

This document is a draft framework agreement between RMK and the supplier, outlining the terms for the delivery of fertilizers and plant protection products to RMK nurseries across Estonia until December 31, 2026, or until the maximum contract value is reached.

Vorschau der Dokumente

Registrieren Sie sich, um Dokumentenzusammenfassungen und Analysen anzuzeigen

75
Gut

Qualitätsbewertung der Ausschreibung

This tender is generally well-structured and clear, providing essential information for potential bidders. While it adheres to basic legal and procedural requirements, there are missed opportunities regarding sustainability integration and minor areas where clarity could be enhanced for a broader audience.

Bewertungsaufschlüsselung

Rechtliche Konformität75/100

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance with reasonable deadlines (16 days), clearly defined procedure type, and appropriate CPV codes. No disputes or suspensions are noted. Mandatory disclosure requirements are met. The handling of the ESPD as 'for information only' and 'not required for submission' might be a point of confusion for international bidders unfamiliar with specific Estonian e-procurement practices, but is likely compliant within the national system.

The phrasing regarding ESPD (for information only, not required for submission) might be unclear for international bidders.
Klarheit80/100

The tender description is clear, and requirements are well-documented, referring to specific annexes for technical details. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as 'total cost of the offer (100% weight, lowest is best)'. AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive. A minor inconsistency exists between 'relative_weighting' and '100% lowest price', though the actual criterion is unambiguous.

Slight terminological inconsistency between 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' and 'total cost of the offer (100% weight, lowest is best)'.
Vollständigkeit70/100

All basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are specified. All relevant documents are attached and summarized. Requirements and evaluation criteria are clearly defined. Location information is provided (NUTS EE) and further clarified in the draft contract. The 'Required: No' status for all provided documents could be confusing, but likely indicates they are for bidder's reference, not submission.

The 'Required: No' status for all tender documents might be confusing, as it typically refers to documents to be submitted by bidders, not those provided by the contracting authority.
Fairness85/100

The tender ensures fairness with full document access, disclosed value, and reasonable deadlines for preparation. Evaluation criteria are objective and transparent (lowest price). E-procurement is enabled for equal access. Requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company, and the justification for not dividing the procurement into parts is provided.

Praktikabilität65/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract start date and duration are clearly specified. Financing information (estimated value) is available. However, the initial 'Täpne piirkond määramata' (Exact region unspecified) in the basic information, despite being clarified in the draft contract, could pose an initial practical hurdle for bidders planning logistics.

Initial lack of precise delivery location information in the basic details, although clarified in Annex 2.
Datenkonsistenz90/100

Key fields are populated, and there are no detected suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical and consistent. A very minor terminological inconsistency exists in the description of evaluation criteria, but it does not impact the clarity of the actual criterion.

Minor terminological inconsistency in evaluation criteria description ('relative_weighting' vs. '100% lowest price').
Nachhaltigkeit50/100

The tender does not explicitly include green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability considerations into the procurement process.

Absence of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.

Stärken

Clear and objective evaluation criteria (lowest price).
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled for accessibility.
All essential tender documents are provided and summarized.
Reasonable submission deadline (16 days).
Estimated value and contract duration are clearly specified.

Bedenken

Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Initial ambiguity regarding exact delivery locations (though clarified in documents).
The phrasing around ESPD (for information only, not required for submission) might be confusing for international bidders.
The 'Required: No' status for all provided documents could be misinterpreted by some bidders.

Empfehlungen

1. Integrate sustainability criteria (e.g., eco-friendly products, sustainable packaging) into future tenders.
2. Ensure all location details are explicitly stated in the main tender description or a prominent annex to avoid initial confusion.
3. Clarify the role of the ESPD and how qualification/exclusion grounds are verified within the Estonian e-procurement system for international bidders.

Vorschau der KI-Bewertung

Registrieren Sie sich, um vollständige Anforderungen und Analysen anzuzeigen

Vollständige Qualitätsbewertungsanalyse
Detaillierte Unterbewertungsaufschlüsselung
Einblicke in Stärken und Bedenken
Strategische Empfehlungen

Keine Kreditkarte erforderlich • Einrichtung in 2 Minuten

Zur Pipeline hinzufügen