Tenders

Fertilizers and plant protection products for RMK nurseries for 2026

Zamknięty

Termin składania ofert minął

Termin składania ofert w tym przetargu minął i nie przyjmujemy już zgłoszeń. Poniższe informacje zostały zachowane w celach informacyjnych.

Przeglądaj Aktywne Przetargi
Termin składania ofert
Przeterminowany
Luty 12, 2026
Szczegóły umowy
Kategoria
Dostawy
Numer Referencyjny
305367
Wartość
€65,000
Lokalizacja
Estonia
Published
Styczeń 27, 2026
Kod CPV
Harmonogram Projektu

Ogłoszenie przetargu

Styczeń 27, 2026

Termin składania pytań

Luty 05, 2026

Termin składania ofert

Luty 12, 2026

Otwarcie ofert

Luty 12, 2026

Data rozpoczęcia kontraktu

Marzec 04, 2026

Prawdopodobieństwo wygranejPRO
🔒
Uaktualnij do Professional
Zobacz szacowane prawdopodobieństwo wygranej na podstawie danych historycznych.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Analityka zamawiającegoPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analitykę zamawiającego
Zobacz wzorce wydatków, preferowane procedury i więcej.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Analiza sektoraPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analizę sektora
Zobacz średnie ceny zwycięskie, poziomy konkurencji i trendy rynkowe.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Budget
€65,000
Duration
Not specified
Lokalizacja
Estonia
Type
Dostawy
75
Ocena Jakości/100
Dobra
Benchmark rynkowy
Śr. cena wygrywająca
€40,562
Śr. liczba ofert
1.9
Konkurencja
Niska
Zwycięzcy MŚP
66%
128 przeanalizowanych zamówień

Oryginalny Opis Przetargu

Ostetakse erinevaid väetisi ja taimekaitsevahendeid koos tarnega.
Electronic Submission

Analiza ryzyka

Zaloguj się, aby korzystać z analizy ryzyka.

Zaloguj się

Strategia wygrywania

Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do rekomendacji strategii wygrywania.

Zaloguj się

Konkurenci

Ulepsz plan, aby zobaczyć, które firmy prawdopodobnie złożą ofertę w tym przetargu, na podstawie historycznych danych zamówień publicznych.

Zaloguj się

Wymagania i Kwalifikacje

17 wymagań w 5 kategoriach

Składanie (6)
Obowiązkowe (1)
Zgodność (2)
Techniczne (6)
Finansowe (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Submit a bid in an open procurement procedure.
--Submit a power of attorney if submitting a joint bid.
--Submit data for the offered fertilizers and plant protection products.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Comply with the exclusion conditions established by the contracting authority (specific conditions are detailed in the ESPD, which is for information).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Comply with the qualification conditions established by the contracting authority (specific conditions are detailed in the ESPD, which is for information).
--The bid must meet the requirements for submission.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Offer fertilizers and plant protection products for RMK nurseries for the year 2026.
--Offered products must comply with the technical specifications, including product names, quantities, and packaging requirements, as detailed in Annex 1 (Technical Description).
--Offered products must be intended for RMK nurseries.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bid must include the total cost of the offer.
--The total cost of the offer is the sole evaluation criterion (100% weight, lowest is best).

Podgląd wymagań

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Dokumenty

6 dokumentów dostępnych z podsumowaniami AI

VastavustingimusedPDF
305367_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 8.1 KB

This document specifies tender submission requirements, including power of attorney for joint bids, detailed data for offered fertilizers and plant protection products, and confirmation of overall bid compliance.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305367_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 5.7 KB

This document details the tender evaluation criteria, where the sole criterion is the total cost of the offer (100% weight, lowest is best), and lists the required fertilizers and plant protection products with their quantities.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305367_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 63.0 KB

This document is an explanatory procurement pass (ESPD) detailing the contracting authority's exclusion grounds and qualification conditions for the procurement of fertilizers and plant protection products, but it is for informational purposes only and not for submission.

HankedokumentDOC
Hankedokument.docx -- 22.8 KB

This tender document invites bids for fertilizers and plant protection products for RMK nurseries for 2026 in an open procurement procedure, describing general conditions, the subject of the framework agreement, and the estimated cost.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus Väetised ja tkv 20... -- 32.0 KB

This document details the technical specifications for fertilizers and plant protection products required by RMK nurseries for 2026, including product names, quantities, packaging requirements, and delivery terms under a framework agreement.

Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 Raamlepingu projekt .docx -- 30.5 KB

This document is a draft framework agreement between RMK and the supplier, outlining the terms for the delivery of fertilizers and plant protection products to RMK nurseries across Estonia until December 31, 2026, or until the maximum contract value is reached.

Podgląd dokumentów

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć podsumowania i analizę dokumentów

75
Dobra

Ocena Jakości Przetargu

This tender is generally well-structured and clear, providing essential information for potential bidders. While it adheres to basic legal and procedural requirements, there are missed opportunities regarding sustainability integration and minor areas where clarity could be enhanced for a broader audience.

Szczegółowy Wynik

Zgodność z przepisami75/100

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance with reasonable deadlines (16 days), clearly defined procedure type, and appropriate CPV codes. No disputes or suspensions are noted. Mandatory disclosure requirements are met. The handling of the ESPD as 'for information only' and 'not required for submission' might be a point of confusion for international bidders unfamiliar with specific Estonian e-procurement practices, but is likely compliant within the national system.

The phrasing regarding ESPD (for information only, not required for submission) might be unclear for international bidders.
Przejrzystość80/100

The tender description is clear, and requirements are well-documented, referring to specific annexes for technical details. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as 'total cost of the offer (100% weight, lowest is best)'. AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive. A minor inconsistency exists between 'relative_weighting' and '100% lowest price', though the actual criterion is unambiguous.

Slight terminological inconsistency between 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' and 'total cost of the offer (100% weight, lowest is best)'.
Kompletność70/100

All basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are specified. All relevant documents are attached and summarized. Requirements and evaluation criteria are clearly defined. Location information is provided (NUTS EE) and further clarified in the draft contract. The 'Required: No' status for all provided documents could be confusing, but likely indicates they are for bidder's reference, not submission.

The 'Required: No' status for all tender documents might be confusing, as it typically refers to documents to be submitted by bidders, not those provided by the contracting authority.
Uczciwość85/100

The tender ensures fairness with full document access, disclosed value, and reasonable deadlines for preparation. Evaluation criteria are objective and transparent (lowest price). E-procurement is enabled for equal access. Requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company, and the justification for not dividing the procurement into parts is provided.

Praktyczność65/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract start date and duration are clearly specified. Financing information (estimated value) is available. However, the initial 'Täpne piirkond määramata' (Exact region unspecified) in the basic information, despite being clarified in the draft contract, could pose an initial practical hurdle for bidders planning logistics.

Initial lack of precise delivery location information in the basic details, although clarified in Annex 2.
Spójność danych90/100

Key fields are populated, and there are no detected suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical and consistent. A very minor terminological inconsistency exists in the description of evaluation criteria, but it does not impact the clarity of the actual criterion.

Minor terminological inconsistency in evaluation criteria description ('relative_weighting' vs. '100% lowest price').
Zrównoważony rozwój50/100

The tender does not explicitly include green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability considerations into the procurement process.

Absence of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.

Mocne strony

Clear and objective evaluation criteria (lowest price).
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled for accessibility.
All essential tender documents are provided and summarized.
Reasonable submission deadline (16 days).
Estimated value and contract duration are clearly specified.

Wątpliwości

Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Initial ambiguity regarding exact delivery locations (though clarified in documents).
The phrasing around ESPD (for information only, not required for submission) might be confusing for international bidders.
The 'Required: No' status for all provided documents could be misinterpreted by some bidders.

Rekomendacje

1. Integrate sustainability criteria (e.g., eco-friendly products, sustainable packaging) into future tenders.
2. Ensure all location details are explicitly stated in the main tender description or a prominent annex to avoid initial confusion.
3. Clarify the role of the ESPD and how qualification/exclusion grounds are verified within the Estonian e-procurement system for international bidders.

Podgląd oceny AI

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Pełna analiza oceny jakości
Szczegółowy rozkład ocen cząstkowych
Mocne strony i obawy – informacje
Rekomendacje strategiczne

Karta kredytowa nie jest wymagana • Konfiguracja w 2 minuty

Dodaj do pipeline'u