Procurement of Miks.ee video stories 2026

This tender is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements and transparent evaluation criteria, indicating a robust procurement process. However, minor concerns exist regarding the explicit availability of all essential documents for bidders and the integration of sustainability aspects.

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance with reasonable deadlines (24 days), a clearly defined procedure type (Negotiated), and appropriate CPV codes. No disputes are reported, and EU funding suggests adherence to higher standards. A minor concern is the system indicating 'Required: No' for the evaluation criteria and main tender document, which could be a procedural oversight in document presentation.

The description of the project, its scope, and the required deliverables (12-part video series, 3-4 min clips, LTT/engineering focus, production, marketing, cross-media) is very clear. Technical requirements, submission items (concept, scenario, team, portfolio), and evaluation criteria are well-documented and understandable. The lack of a specific execution area is a minor point for clarity.

Basic information, financial details, and timelines are comprehensively provided. Requirements and evaluation criteria are well-defined. However, the system's indication of 'Required: No' for the evaluation criteria document and the main tender document is a significant concern, as these are critical for bidders to fully understand the tender.

Fairness is generally high, with the estimated value disclosed, reasonable deadlines, and objective, weighted evaluation criteria. E-procurement and electronic submission ensure equal access. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company. The 'Required: No' flag for key documents is the only minor concern regarding full and explicit document access.

Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported, enhancing practicality. The contract duration is specified. However, the contract start date is not explicitly known, and the financing condition is somewhat generic. A direct document URL is not provided, though implied by e-procurement.

The tender exhibits high data consistency, with all key fields populated, logical dates, and no reported suspensions or disputes. Information across the description and AI-extracted requirements is consistent.

While the tender is EU Funded, the automated checks indicate a lack of explicit green procurement, social criteria, or innovation focus. This is a common area for improvement in many tenders, especially for creative services where such aspects might require specific framing.