Purchase of Portable 3D Scanners

This tender for portable 3D scanners demonstrates good legal compliance and clarity in its requirements and evaluation criteria, utilizing standard EU procurement practices. However, it exhibits moderate completeness and practicality issues due to missing contract duration and location details, and a significant lack of sustainability considerations.

The tender utilizes standard EU procurement tools like ESPD and adheres to WTO/GPA principles, indicating a strong foundation in legal compliance. Deadlines are reasonable, and CPV codes are appropriate. The procedure type is defined by code 'A'.

The tender provides a clear description of the goods, and requirements are well-structured and detailed across multiple documents, including technical specifications and evaluation criteria. The AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and clearly state 'lowest price' as the sole evaluation criterion.

Basic information, financial details, and key deadlines are provided. Requirements and evaluation criteria are defined. However, crucial information such as the specific contract duration and location (NUTS code) is missing, which are notable gaps.

The tender promotes equal access through e-procurement and discloses the estimated value. Evaluation based solely on the lowest price is objective and transparent. Document access appears full. The requirement for 'manufacturer's authorization' is noted but not strong enough to suggest tailoring.

Electronic submission is supported, enhancing practicality. However, the absence of a clear contract start date and, more importantly, the contract duration, creates uncertainty for potential bidders regarding project planning and resource allocation.

Key dates are logical and sequential, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Most essential fields are populated. The automated check's flag regarding 'missing evaluation criteria' contradicts the tender's explicit content, but this is a reporting inconsistency rather than a tender data inconsistency.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.