Purchase of crushing service for large-lump limestone waste rock

This tender demonstrates strong clarity and completeness with well-defined requirements and transparent evaluation criteria, but is significantly hampered by an invalid CPV code and a complete lack of sustainability considerations.

The primary concern is the invalid CPV code '12465', which is not a standard 8-digit format and impacts proper classification and legal compliance. The procedure type (LM) appears appropriate for a utility entity of this value, and other basic legal requirements seem to be met.

The tender is exceptionally clear with detailed descriptions, well-defined requirements, and transparent evaluation criteria (80% cost, 10% productivity with bonus points). All performance conditions are clearly referenced to specific documents.

All essential information, including title, reference, organization, value, deadlines, duration, location, and a comprehensive set of 10 supporting documents, is provided. Requirements and criteria are thoroughly defined.

The tender demonstrates high fairness with full document access, disclosed value, objective evaluation criteria, and e-procurement. Requirements for experience and equipment are specific but appear reasonable and not tailored to a specific company. 'Max Participants: 1' is understood as a single-supplier framework, which is a common practice.

Electronic submission is supported, contract start and duration are clear, and financing information is referenced. The absence of an explicit document URL in the provided text is a minor detail, as e-procurement implies accessibility.

Key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. The main inconsistency lies with the invalid CPV code format. No disputes or suspensions are reported.

The tender lacks explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. Occupational health and safety are covered as a basic legal requirement rather than an added social value, resulting in a low score for sustainability.