Term Maintenance Contract for Electrical Repairs to Non-Housing Properties

This tender for electrical maintenance services is generally clear on scope and includes some positive aspects like e-procurement and community benefits, but is significantly hampered by the critical absence of evaluation criteria and notable data inconsistencies.

The tender correctly defines the open procedure and CPV codes, and the submission period (34 days) is reasonable. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria raises significant concerns regarding compliance with transparency and equal treatment principles in public procurement. Mandatory exclusion grounds are also not detailed in the provided text.

The description of the required works and technical capabilities is generally clear and unambiguous. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it impossible for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed, which is a major clarity deficiency.

Basic tender information, estimated value, and contract duration are provided. However, the tender lacks detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, specific financial requirements, and crucially, evaluation criteria. The inclusion of an irrelevant document (Document 2) also points to issues in document management.

The tender discloses the estimated value and indicates e-procurement, suggesting a commitment to equal access. Requirements appear generic and not tailored. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria severely undermines the objectivity and transparency of the procurement process, making it difficult for bidders to compete fairly.

The contract duration is clearly specified. While 'E-Procurement' is listed, the automated check flags 'No e-submission,' creating an inconsistency that could cause practical confusion for bidders. A document URL and contract start date are not provided.

Several key fields, such as 'Liable Person' and procedure codes, are empty. A significant inconsistency exists between the stated 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the 'No e-submission' automated check result. Most critically, an entirely irrelevant document (Document 2) is included, indicating poor data management and consistency.

The tender includes a requirement for 'community benefits,' addressing a social aspect of sustainability. However, it does not explicitly incorporate green procurement principles or an innovation focus, nor is it EU funded, limiting its overall sustainability ambition.