United Kingdom10 days leftOpen

WE_1140 PTP Oskemen

Tender Overview

ORGANIZATION

British Council

LOCATION

Inner London - East, United Kingdom

VALUE

£180,000

DEADLINE

February 12, 2026 at 11:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

79952000

REFERENCE

006870-2026

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

British Council Kazakhstan looking for Computer Delivery Exams Partners in Oskemen, Kazakhstan. The contract will be awarded to locally registered supplier(s).
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided information.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The supplier must be a locally registered entity in Kazakhstan.
  • The supplier must operate in Oskemen, Kazakhstan.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The supplier must be capable of delivering Computer Delivery Exams (computer-based exams).
  • The supplier must have the necessary infrastructure and personnel to conduct computer-based exams in Oskemen.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided information.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Bids must be submitted by 2026-02-12 at 11:00:00+00:00 (UTC).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

DOC
OCDS Record
OCDS Data006870-2026_ocds_record.json
Summary:
This OCDS record provides structured data detailing the British Council Kazakhstan's tender for locally registered Computer Delivery Exams Partners in Oskemen.
DOC
OCDS Release Package
OCDS Data006870-2026_ocds_release.json
Summary:
The British Council Kazakhstan is seeking locally registered partners in Oskemen to deliver computer-based exams.
PDF
Official PDF Version
Administrative Documents006870-2026_official.pdf
Summary:
The British Council Kazakhstan seeks locally registered Computer Delivery Exams Partners in Oskemen for a contract valued up to £180,000, with submissions due by February 12, 2026.
HTM
Tender Notice
Administrative Documents006870-2026.html
Summary:
Brighton and Hove City Council is seeking design team consultants across multiple specialisms for two redevelopment sites, Hollingdean and Whitehawk, to progress designs to RIBA stage 3.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

45
Fair

Tender Quality Score

This tender exhibits significant deficiencies in clarity, completeness, and fairness, primarily due to missing critical information and inconsistencies in the provided documentation. While basic information is present, the lack of evaluation criteria and e-submission are major concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance55/100

The tender lacks specific mandatory exclusion grounds and, critically, evaluation criteria, which are fundamental for legal compliance and transparency. The CPV code is slightly misaligned, and the NUTS code (UKI41) is inconsistent with the service location in Kazakhstan.

Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity40/100

While the service description is clear, the absence of evaluation criteria, financial requirements, and the erroneous content summary for Document 1 severely undermine the overall clarity of the tender documentation.

No evaluation criteria specified
No specific financial requirements detailed
Completeness45/100

Basic information is mostly present, but the tender is incomplete regarding crucial details such as mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria. The 'Divided into Parts' characteristic is mentioned without elaboration, and one document's summary is incorrect.

Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
Missing specific financial requirements
Fairness35/100

The absence of specified evaluation criteria is a critical fairness issue, preventing bidders from understanding the award basis. The lack of e-submission limits equal access, and while local registration is restrictive, it's not necessarily tailored to a specific company.

No evaluation criteria specified
No electronic submission (e-submission) supported
Practicality60/100

The lack of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. While contract start date and duration are clear, the absence of detailed financing information beyond the estimated value is a minor gap.

No electronic submission (e-submission) supported
No detailed financing information beyond estimated value
Data Consistency40/100

The NUTS code (UKI41) for a service in Kazakhstan is a major geographical inconsistency. Furthermore, the content summary for Document 1 is completely irrelevant, indicating a significant data integrity issue. Some key fields like 'Liable Person' and procedure codes are empty.

Inconsistent NUTS code (UKI41 for Kazakhstan service)
Document 1 content summary is irrelevant to the tender
Sustainability20/100

The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social, or innovation aspects, nor is it EU funded, indicating a lack of focus on modern sustainability principles.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Basic tender information (title, reference, organization, value, duration, start date) is mostly present.
Description of the required service is clear and unambiguous.
Estimated value of the contract is disclosed.
Documents are listed as available.

Concerns

Critical absence of evaluation criteria and mandatory exclusion grounds.
Incorrect and irrelevant content summary for one of the tender documents.
Lack of electronic submission functionality.
Significant data inconsistencies, particularly with the NUTS code.
No explicit mention of sustainability, social, or innovation aspects.

Recommendations

1. Publish comprehensive evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion grounds, and detailed financial requirements to enhance transparency and fairness.
2. Correct the erroneous content summary for Document 1 and verify the accuracy of all attached documentation.
3. Implement an electronic submission system to improve accessibility, efficiency, and equal access for bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
C
Tender Quality Score
45/ 100 · Fair

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes