LiveWest Workplace Facilities Management PPM & Reactive Maintenance

This tender provides clear basic information and requirements for facilities management services but is significantly hampered by the complete absence of evaluation criteria, lack of e-submission, and no integration of sustainability aspects.

The tender defines the open procedure and uses an appropriate CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable (14 days from today's date to submission). However, the reveal date is missing, and specific mandatory exclusion grounds are not detailed in the provided summaries, which could be a transparency concern if not fully elaborated in the complete documents.

The service description and basic eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are clear and understandable. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major deficiency, significantly impacting clarity for potential bidders. Performance conditions are also not detailed.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, deadlines, and duration are well-provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the explicit lack of evaluation criteria and the high-level nature of the AI-extracted requirements. The 'Divided into Parts' characteristic is mentioned but not elaborated.

The estimated value is disclosed, and requirements appear generic, not tailored to a specific company. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises fairness and transparency, as bidders cannot understand the basis for award. The lack of e-submission also creates an accessibility barrier.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the lack of electronic submission support is a significant practical drawback, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders. While documents are available, a direct URL for the procurement portal is not explicitly provided in the summary.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include missing 'Liable Person' and 'Type Code' fields, and the 'Missing reveal date' flag.

The tender explicitly lacks any mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards. This represents a significant missed opportunity for incorporating modern procurement best practices.