Development of construction project and execution of construction works for the object “Construction of road barriers at “Sēlija” polygon, in Aizkraukle and Jēkabpils municipalities” (2 stages)

This tender demonstrates a generally compliant and clear procurement process with good use of e-procurement, but significant concerns arise from restricted document access and inconsistencies in the provided data analysis.

The tender defines an open procedure with a clear CPV code and no reported disputes, indicating a generally compliant framework. The provided deadline is reasonable. However, the flag for 'Restricted document access' is a significant concern, potentially hindering full transparency and legal compliance if essential tender documents are not publicly available.

The tender's title, description, and performance conditions are clearly stated. The summary of Document 5 indicates that detailed requirements, exclusion/selection criteria, and evaluation criteria are well-documented, contributing to overall clarity.

All essential basic information, financial details, timeline, and location are provided. Key documents like the tender regulations, technical specifications, and contract draft are listed. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag raises concerns about the actual completeness of information available to potential bidders.

The tender discloses the estimated value and supports e-procurement, promoting equal access. The deadline is reasonable, and requirements appear generic. Nevertheless, the reported 'Restricted document access' is a critical impediment to fairness, as it could prevent all potential bidders from having equal access to necessary information.

The tender supports electronic submission, which enhances practicality for bidders. The contract duration is clearly specified. While a direct document URL is not explicitly provided in the basic info, the e-procurement system implies accessibility.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there are inconsistencies between the automated check results (e.g., 'Missing evaluation criteria', 'No e-submission') and the explicit tender characteristics or document summaries (e.g., 'E-Procurement', Document 5 outlining 'tender evaluation criteria').

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, nor is it indicated as EU-funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.