Legal Compliance100/100
The tender mentions 'MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS' but explicitly states they are not detailed in the provided description, directing bidders to full documents. The 'Competitive flexible procedure' suggests adherence to relevant procurement regulations, but the absence of explicit selection and award criteria in this extract is a notable gap.
•Lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided extract.
•Absence of detailed eligibility, selection, and award criteria, including weighting, in the provided extract.
Clarity40/100
The overall scope of services is clear, including main lunch and morning break. However, several technical capability requirements are subjective (e.g., 'high-quality service standards,' 'excellence,' 'innovation') without clear definitions or measurable criteria in the extract, which could lead to ambiguity in evaluation.
•Subjective nature of some technical capability requirements without clear definitions or measurable criteria.
•Lack of detailed explanation for the 'guaranteed performance basis' and 'fixed annual return and/or subsidy' financial requirements.
Completeness83/100
The provided tender extract is highly incomplete, explicitly stating 'No documents attached' and repeatedly directing bidders to an external eSourcing portal and a 'PSQ Document' for essential information. This means critical details such as full specifications, detailed exclusion/selection/award criteria, and the draft contract are missing from this summary.
•Absence of full tender documents (ITT, PSQ, specifications, draft contract) in the provided extract.
•Missing detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, selection, and award criteria.
Fairness60/100
Without the full tender documents, it is challenging to fully assess fairness. The subjective nature of some requirements could potentially lead to inconsistent or unfair evaluation if not supported by objective criteria in the complete documentation. The financial model's specifics are also crucial for fair competition.
•Potential for subjective evaluation due to high-level, undefined requirements in the extract.
•Lack of transparency regarding the full evaluation methodology and award criteria.
Practicality40/100
The service requirements (main lunch, morning break, engagement) are practical for a school catering contract. The emphasis on flexibility and meeting evolving needs is also practical for a long-term agreement. However, the financial model's complexity ('guaranteed performance basis,' 'fixed annual return and/or subsidy') might pose practical challenges for bidders in accurate pricing without further detail.
•Complexity for bidders to accurately price the 'guaranteed performance basis' and 'fixed annual return and/or subsidy' without detailed financial models or expectations.
Data Consistency100/100
The estimated value in EUR (1,851,000.00) aligns with the maximum potential contract value over the full 6-year term (3 years initial + 3 years extension) when considering the annual GBP value (£308,500), assuming an approximate currency conversion. No significant inconsistencies were detected.
Sustainability50/100
The tender explicitly highlights 'Social Criteria' and the school's context in a socially deprived area with a high percentage of FSM pupils, indicating a strong social sustainability focus. However, specific environmental sustainability requirements are not detailed in the provided extract.
•Lack of explicit environmental sustainability requirements detailed in the provided extract.