Development of construction design documentation for the object: "Restoration of the bridge over Daugava, Jēkabpils, Jēkabpils municipality"

This tender provides clear basic information and supports e-procurement, but it is significantly hampered by issues related to fairness, including a highly specific experience requirement and restricted document access.

Legal compliance is moderate. While the procedure type and CPV codes are appropriate, the highly specific experience requirement for 'renovation of a bridge over the Daugava river in Jēkabpils' raises concerns about proportionality and non-discrimination, potentially violating procurement principles. Mandatory exclusion grounds are not explicitly detailed in the provided summaries.

The project description is clear and unambiguous. Requirements are generally well-documented by referring to specific tender documents, but the full details and weighting of evaluation criteria are not immediately clear from the summaries. The lack of extracted content for one listed document ('Tehniskā apsekošana') also hinders complete understanding.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and location is complete. However, the estimated value is not disclosed. Crucially, the flag 'Restricted document access' and the unknown content of one listed document ('Tehniskā apsekošana') represent significant gaps in readily available and comprehensive information.

Fairness is significantly compromised. The 'Restricted document access' is a major barrier to equal opportunity. Furthermore, the technical capability requirement to 'Demonstrate relevant experience in the renovation of a bridge over the Daugava river in Jēkabpils' is highly specific and appears tailored to a particular local entity or previous contractor, severely limiting competition and transparency. The undisclosed estimated value also reduces transparency.

Electronic submission is supported, which is a positive aspect for practicality. However, the lack of a specific contract start date, the undisclosed estimated value (financing information), and the 'Restricted document access' reduce the practical ease and planning capabilities for potential bidders.

Most key fields are populated, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, the estimated value is missing, and there is a critical inconsistency where the 'Opening Date' is listed as 2026-02-20 00:00:00, which is before the 'Submission Deadline' of 2026-02-20 10:00:00.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement criteria, social aspects, or a focus on innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.