Water Fountains and Splashpad Maintenance & Water Testing Contract

This tender provides clear service descriptions and practical details but suffers from significant gaps in legal compliance, completeness, and fairness due to an incorrect CPV code, missing explicit mandatory requirements, and critically, the absence of evaluation criteria.

The tender defines the procedure type and has a reasonable submission deadline. However, the assigned CPV code (Chemical products) is incorrect for maintenance and water quality testing services, which is a significant classification error. Mandatory exclusion and eligibility grounds are not explicitly stated in the provided snippets, raising concerns about full disclosure.

The service description and technical capability requirements are clear and unambiguous. However, the tender critically lacks specified evaluation criteria, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed. Financial requirements are also not explicitly stated in the provided snippets.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, duration, and location are provided. However, the tender is incomplete regarding explicit mandatory exclusion, eligibility, and financial requirements in the provided snippets. Most critically, evaluation criteria are missing, and the full tender documents are only accessible via an external portal, limiting the completeness of the information provided for analysis.

The tender discloses the estimated value, provides a reasonable deadline for preparation, and supports e-procurement for equal access. The technical requirements appear generic and not tailored. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises fairness, as it introduces subjectivity and reduces transparency in the bidding process.

The tender demonstrates excellent practicality. Electronic submission is clearly supported via a specified portal, a direct URL is provided, the contract start date and duration are known, and financing information (estimated value) is available.

Dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes. However, the CPV code is inconsistent with the service description. Additionally, some key fields like 'Liable Person', 'Type Code', and 'Procedure Code' are left empty.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement initiatives, social aspects, or a focus on innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.