Legal Compliance75/100
As a pre-market engagement, this notice appropriately lacks formal tender procedures and evaluation criteria. The deadlines are reasonable for market consultation, and basic legal disclosures are met. The 'Type: None' and 'Procedure: None' reflect its planning status, though a specific 'Market Consultation' type would be ideal for formal classification.
Clarity80/100
The tender's purpose as an 'initial market engagement and discovery exercise' is exceptionally clear and unambiguous. Requirements for participation are well-documented and understandable, explicitly stating what is not required at this preliminary stage.
Completeness70/100
The notice provides all essential basic information, including title, organization, estimated value (with caveats), and future contract timeline. While it lacks formal tender elements like detailed evaluation criteria, this is consistent with its pre-market engagement nature. The absence of a formal procedure type is a minor data gap.
Fairness85/100
The requirements are generic and not tailored, promoting broad market participation. Document access is provided, and the estimated value is disclosed. The 31-day submission period is reasonable for a market engagement. The lack of specified evaluation criteria is appropriate for a discovery phase.
Practicality65/100
The absence of explicit electronic submission support and a direct document URL are practical drawbacks in modern procurement. While future contract dates are provided, these pertain to a subsequent procurement, not the current engagement.
•No explicit electronic submission support
•Missing direct document URL
Data Consistency90/100
Key fields are largely populated, and the information provided is logical and consistent, particularly regarding the timeline for future procurement. The 'Liable Person' field is unpopulated, and the 'reveal date' is missing, which are minor data quality issues.
•Missing 'Liable Person'
•Missing reveal date
Sustainability50/100
The tender has a strong inherent focus on innovation by exploring AI technology solutions for public services. While environmental improvements and social value are mentioned for future consideration, they are not explicit requirements for the current engagement, limiting the immediate sustainability score.
•Sustainability and social criteria are for future consideration, not current requirements