Legal Compliance100/100
The tender lacks fundamental elements required for a legally sound procurement process. The absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, full tender documents, and evaluation criteria creates significant legal risks and non-compliance with best practices.
•Absence of mandatory exclusion grounds
•No tender documents attached or content available
Clarity40/100
The description of the services and the general eligibility/technical requirements are clear in their intent. However, the lack of detailed tender documents means there is no clarity on how these requirements will be assessed or what specific evidence is needed.
•Lack of detailed instructions on how requirements will be assessed
•Absence of full tender documents leading to overall ambiguity
Completeness83/100
The tender is critically incomplete. The most significant issue is the complete absence of tender documents, which are essential for bidders to understand the full scope, terms, and conditions. Furthermore, evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion grounds, and specific financial requirements are missing.
•Absence of tender documents (0 total)
•Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness60/100
The lack of tender documents and evaluation criteria severely compromises the fairness and transparency of the process. Bidders cannot adequately prepare or understand the basis on which their proposals will be judged, potentially leading to subjective evaluation. While the requirements are specific to the SSRO's context, the absence of detailed documentation makes it difficult to ascertain if they are unduly tailored.
•Lack of transparency due to missing documents and evaluation criteria
•Potential for subjective evaluation due to broad requirements and undefined assessment methods
Practicality40/100
From a bidder's perspective, it is highly impractical to prepare a comprehensive and compliant bid without any tender documents, detailed instructions, or evaluation criteria. For the procuring entity, evaluating bids without predefined criteria will be challenging, prone to inconsistencies, and susceptible to disputes.
•Bidders cannot practically prepare a comprehensive and compliant bid
•Evaluation process will be difficult and inconsistent without defined criteria
Data Consistency100/100
The information provided within the tender extract is consistent. However, the primary concern is the significant *absence* of crucial data (documents, criteria) rather than inconsistencies within the available data.
Sustainability0/100
The tender does not include any specific green, social, or innovation criteria. While the service type (advisory) might have less direct environmental impact, incorporating social or innovation aspects could still enhance the procurement's overall value.
•No green procurement criteria specified
•No social criteria specified