Vehicle Removal Services

This tender presents a moderate overall quality, with significant deficiencies in fairness and completeness, primarily due to the absence of evaluation criteria and geographical restrictions. While the service description is clear, critical elements for a transparent and competitive process are missing.

The procedure type and CPV codes are clearly defined, and the 1-month submission period is generally reasonable for a below-threshold tender. However, the missing reveal date prevents confirmation of the minimum publication period, and the AI summary indicates no explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, which is a concern. The geographical restriction to Essex-based suppliers, while potentially permissible for below-threshold tenders under UK law, could be seen as limiting competition.

The service description and technical requirements are very clear and detailed, including specific legislative compliance. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria is a significant deficiency, making it difficult for potential bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.

Basic information, financial details, timeline, and location are well-provided. Documents are listed and summarized. Technical and eligibility requirements are defined. However, the critical omission of evaluation criteria and the lack of detail regarding the 'Divided into Parts' characteristic significantly reduce the completeness score.

The tender value is disclosed, and documents are accessible. However, the absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises transparency and objectivity, making it difficult for bidders to compete fairly. The lack of e-submission creates an unnecessary barrier. The requirement for suppliers to be 'Essex-based' restricts competition, even if legally permissible for below-threshold procurements, and thus impacts fairness.

Key practical details like contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the absence of electronic submission capabilities is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders and the contracting authority.

The tender generally presents consistent information regarding dates, values, and descriptions. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include missing codes for the procedure type and the lack of detail for the 'Divided into Parts' characteristic.

The tender explicitly includes social aspects by giving preference to SMEs and VCSEs, which is a positive contribution to sustainability. However, it lacks any stated focus on environmental (green procurement) or innovation criteria.