Lease of a research vessel for the Latvian Institute of Hydroecology's marine observations

This tender for research vessel rental demonstrates good clarity and data consistency but is significantly hampered by restricted document access and an undisclosed estimated value, raising serious concerns about fairness and legal compliance.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly, and the submission deadline is reasonable. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a significant concern regarding transparency and equal access to information, which are fundamental principles of public procurement law. The lack of an estimated value, while not always a legal breach, reduces transparency.

The tender description is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of what is expected, referencing specific technical and contractual documents. The evaluation method (lowest price) is explicitly stated, and performance conditions refer to the technical specification and draft contract, ensuring clarity.

Most essential information, such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, duration, and location (NUTS code), is provided. All five tender documents are attached and summarized. The primary deficiency is the undisclosed estimated value, which is crucial for bidders to assess the opportunity fully.

The 'Restricted document access' is a critical flaw, severely undermining the principle of equal treatment and transparency. The undisclosed estimated value further hinders fair competition. While the 'lowest price' evaluation method is objective, the barriers to information access make it difficult for all potential bidders to prepare competitive offers. The highly specific technical requirements could also potentially limit competition, though this cannot be fully assessed without document access.

The tender indicates 'E-Procurement' and an electronic opening place, suggesting electronic submission is supported, which is practical. The duration is clearly specified. However, the 'Restricted document access' creates a significant practical barrier for interested parties. The absence of a specific contract start date and undisclosed financing information also pose practical challenges for bidders' planning.

Key dates are logical, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The tender status is active. While there are minor contradictions between automated checks and AI-extracted content (e.g., evaluation criteria, e-submission), the core data provided is largely consistent. The main inconsistency is the undisclosed estimated value.

The tender does not include any explicit requirements or considerations related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.