Collection, Transport, and Disposal of Animal By-Products

This tender, currently in a preliminary market engagement phase, provides a clear service description and essential timeline details, but lacks critical procedural definitions, evaluation criteria, and electronic submission capabilities for a full tender.

The notice correctly identifies the CPV code and references relevant EC regulations for the service. However, the absence of a defined procurement procedure type and liable person are significant omissions for a formal tender, even if acceptable for a preliminary market engagement notice.

The description of the required service, including material categories and regulatory compliance, is clear. Requirements for participating in the preliminary market engagement are also well-defined. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria, financial requirements, and mandatory exclusion grounds for the eventual tender significantly impacts overall clarity for potential bidders.

Basic information such as title, organization, reference, estimated value, duration, and location are provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of a defined procedure type, liable person, and, most critically, evaluation criteria for the subsequent tender. Financial and exclusion grounds are also explicitly noted as not yet defined.

Document access is provided, and the estimated value is disclosed, which promotes transparency. Requirements appear generic for qualified contractors. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria for the future tender compromises objectivity and transparency. The absence of electronic submission also creates a barrier to equal access.

Key practical details like contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the lack of electronic submission significantly reduces the practicality and efficiency of the procurement process for potential suppliers.

Dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. While some key fields like procedure type and liable person are unpopulated, the existing data is internally consistent.

The tender does not include any explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, nor is it indicated as EU-funded, which typically encourages higher sustainability standards.