United Kingdom21 days leftOpen

Copmanthorpe Primary School - Fencing, Fire Doors and Asbestos

Tender Overview

ORGANIZATION

City of York Council

LOCATION

North Yorkshire, United Kingdom

VALUE

£204,000

DEADLINE

February 23, 2026 at 12:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

44221220

REFERENCE

004359-2026

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

The City of York Council has an opportunity for Copmanthorpe Primary School - Fencing, Fire Doors and Asbestos
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • No specific mandatory exclusion grounds were identified from the provided summaries.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • No specific eligibility requirements were identified from the provided summaries.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Demonstrate capability to perform fencing works.
  • Demonstrate capability to perform fire door installation and/or supply works (CPV category 44221220).
  • Demonstrate capability to perform asbestos removal works.
  • Demonstrate ability to complete all required works at Copmanthorpe Primary School within a 2-month contract duration.
  • Demonstrate the quality aspects of the proposed works, as quality will account for 60% of the award criterion.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • No specific financial requirements were identified from the provided summaries.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit the tender by the deadline of 2026-02-23T12:00:00+00:00.
  • The tender submission must clearly address both price and quality, as the award criteria are 60% quality and 40% price.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

DOC
OCDS Record
OCDS Data004359-2026_ocds_record.json
Summary:
This OCDS record provides structured data about the City of York Council's open tender for fencing, fire doors, and asbestos work at Copmanthorpe Primary School, detailing the buyer and basic tender information.
DOC
OCDS Release Package
OCDS Data004359-2026_ocds_release.json
Summary:
This OCDS Release Package offers standardized, machine-readable data detailing the City of York Council's open tender for fencing, fire doors, and asbestos work at Copmanthorpe Primary School, including buyer information and tender specifics.
PDF
Official PDF Version
General Information004359-2026_official.pdf
Summary:
The City of York Council is seeking tenders for fencing, fire doors, and asbestos works at Copmanthorpe Primary School, with an estimated value of £170,000 and a submission deadline of February 23, 2026.
HTM
Tender Notice
Administrative Documents004359-2026.html
Summary:
This document is a tender notice from City of York Council for works at Copmanthorpe Primary School, including fencing, fire doors, and asbestos removal, with an estimated value of £170,000, a submission deadline of 23 February 2026, and a 60:40 price:quality award criterion.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

57
Fair

Tender Quality Score

This tender provides basic information but exhibits significant gaps in legal compliance, clarity, and completeness, particularly concerning exclusion, eligibility, and detailed evaluation criteria. The absence of e-submission and disregard for sustainability aspects are also notable concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance55/100

The tender lacks specific mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and financial requirements, which are serious legal deficiencies. The assigned CPV code is too narrow for the scope of works, and the reveal date is missing, impacting transparency.

Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
Missing eligibility requirements
Clarity65/100

While the award criteria split (60% quality, 40% price) is specified, the detailed evaluation criteria for the 'quality' component are not provided in the summaries, significantly reducing clarity for potential bidders. The overall set of requirements is not comprehensive.

Missing detailed quality evaluation criteria
Overall requirements are not comprehensive
Completeness60/100

Basic information is present, but the significant absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, financial requirements, and detailed quality evaluation criteria renders the tender substantially incomplete.

Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
Missing eligibility requirements
Fairness60/100

The lack of detailed quality evaluation criteria introduces subjectivity into the evaluation process, potentially impacting fairness. Furthermore, the absence of electronic submission (e-submission) creates a barrier to equal access for all potential bidders.

Lack of detailed quality evaluation criteria
No e-submission option
Practicality50/100

The absence of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback, making the tender process less efficient and accessible for bidders. While other practical elements like contract start and duration are clear, this omission is critical.

No e-submission option
Data Consistency70/100

A notable inconsistency exists in the estimated value, stated as 204,000.00 EUR in the basic information but £170,000 in document summaries. Minor fields like 'Liable Person' and 'Type/Procedure Code' are also unpopulated.

Inconsistent estimated value (EUR vs GBP)
Missing 'Liable Person'
Sustainability20/100

The tender completely lacks any mention or integration of green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation focus, indicating a missed opportunity for sustainable public procurement practices.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Basic information (title, reference, organization, description, deadlines, value, duration) is provided
Procedure type is clearly defined as 'Open' and 'Below threshold - open competition'
Value is disclosed and not classified
Documents are available (4 listed, including OCDS data for transparency)
Award criteria split (60% quality, 40% price) is specified

Concerns

Significant gaps in legal compliance (missing mandatory exclusion, eligibility, financial requirements)
Lack of detailed evaluation criteria for the 60% quality component
Narrow CPV code for the broad scope of works
No electronic submission option, hindering practicality and equal access
Absence of any sustainability (green, social, innovation) criteria

Recommendations

1. Enhance legal compliance and completeness by including all mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, and financial requirements.
2. Improve clarity and fairness by providing detailed, objective evaluation criteria for the 'quality' component.
3. Modernize the submission process by implementing electronic submission (e-submission).

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
C
Tender Quality Score
57/ 100 · Fair

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes