Coastal and Flood Defence Maintenance Works

This tender presents a moderately complete and clear description of the required works, but critically lacks specified evaluation criteria, which significantly impacts fairness and clarity for potential bidders. The absence of e-submission and sustainability considerations also reduces its overall quality.

The tender generally complies with legal requirements, featuring a clear procedure type, appropriate CPV codes, and a reasonable submission period of 34 days. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, the 'Missing reveal date' and the lack of detailed 'specific mandatory exclusion grounds' in the AI summary are minor administrative and clarity concerns, respectively.

The project description is clear and unambiguous regarding the scope of maintenance and civil engineering works. However, the AI-extracted requirements mention 'specific conditions of participation' and 'mandatory exclusion grounds' without detailing them, which reduces clarity. Crucially, the tender is flagged for 'Missing evaluation criteria', which is a significant deficiency, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.

The tender provides essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and location. All listed documents are available and summarized. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria and the lack of detailed 'specific conditions of participation' make the tender incomplete for bidders to formulate fully compliant and competitive proposals.

While the tender offers full document access, discloses the value, and provides a reasonable deadline, its fairness is severely compromised by the 'Missing evaluation criteria'. Without transparent evaluation criteria, bidders cannot understand the basis of award, leading to a non-objective and potentially unfair process. Additionally, the absence of e-submission ('No e-submission') can create barriers to equal access for all potential suppliers.

The tender clearly specifies the contract start date and duration, and provides financing information for planned maintenance. However, the lack of electronic submission ('No e-submission') is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders and the contracting authority.

The tender exhibits strong data consistency, with key fields largely populated, logical and consistent dates, and no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor omissions include the 'Liable Person' and specific codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure', but these do not impact the overall consistency of critical information.

This tender scores low on sustainability as it does not incorporate any green procurement, social criteria, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.