BT366 - Data Management & Visualisation Services for WCC Air Quality Monitoring Sites

This tender for Data Management & Visualisation Services presents a moderate quality assessment, with clear basic information but significant gaps in detailed requirements and practical implementation like e-submission.

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes. However, the contradiction between a disclosed estimated value and 'Value Classified: Yes' raises transparency concerns. The missing reveal date also impacts full process transparency, though the submission period from today's date is reasonable.

The service description and evaluation criteria (70% quality, 30% price) are clear. However, the AI-extracted requirements indicate a lack of specific eligibility and mandatory exclusion grounds, which are crucial for bidders. Technical requirements are also quite generic.

Most basic information, including title, reference, organization, description, deadlines, value, duration, and CPV code, is provided. Documents are listed. However, the absence of detailed eligibility and mandatory exclusion criteria in the AI summary suggests potential incompleteness in the full tender documentation regarding these critical aspects.

Evaluation criteria are objective and transparent (70% quality, 30% price), and requirements appear generic. However, the absence of electronic submission ('No e-submission' flag) significantly hinders equal access and fairness for potential bidders. The 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside a disclosed value also reduces transparency.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the critical issue is the lack of electronic submission support, which is a significant practical drawback for a tender in 2026. Document URLs are not explicitly provided in the input.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The primary inconsistency lies in the financial information, where an estimated value is provided, but the value is also marked as 'Classified'.

The tender explicitly lacks any focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards. This indicates a very low priority for sustainability considerations.