Q1488/01 Re-tender – Provision of Community Asset Transfer (CAT) Business Support

This tender demonstrates good clarity and practicality, with transparent evaluation criteria and support for e-submission. However, it has notable gaps in legal compliance and completeness due to the explicit absence of mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed sub-criteria.

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV code, and no disputes are reported. However, the AI-extracted requirements explicitly state that 'No mandatory exclusion grounds are explicitly provided in the summarized tender documents,' which is a significant omission regarding fundamental legal compliance requirements.

The tender description is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements for eligibility, technical capability (method statement), financial proposal, and submission are well-defined. The main evaluation criteria (90% quality, 10% price) are clearly specified. However, detailed sub-criteria for the 90% quality evaluation are not provided in the summary, which could enhance clarity.

Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are all provided, and documents are available. Key requirements are outlined. However, the explicit absence of mandatory exclusion grounds (as per AI summary) is a major completeness gap. Additionally, while 'Divided into Parts' is mentioned, no details on these parts are provided, and detailed sub-criteria for evaluation are missing.

The tender encourages participation from SMEs and VCSEs, promoting broader access. The value is disclosed, and e-procurement via the eTenderWales portal ensures equal access. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company. The evaluation criteria (90% quality, 10% price) are transparent, though the absence of sub-criteria could introduce minor subjectivity.

Electronic submission is clearly supported via the eTenderWales portal. The contract start date and duration are explicitly stated. Financing information (estimated value) is available. The overall process seems practical for potential bidders.

Key fields are populated, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical and consistent. There is a minor discrepancy between the estimated value in EUR and the GBP equivalent in one document summary, but this is acceptable for an estimate. The information provided is largely coherent.

The tender explicitly encourages participation from Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) and Voluntary, Community and Social Enterprises (VCSEs), which is a positive social aspect of sustainability. However, there is no mention of specific green procurement criteria or innovation focus.