Study on Media Literacy of Latvian Residents

This tender for a media literacy study demonstrates good clarity and data consistency with detailed requirements and forms. However, significant concerns exist regarding restricted document access, which severely impacts fairness, and the absence of a specified contract duration.

The tender generally adheres to standard legal requirements, with a clearly defined open procedure and reasonable submission period. CPV codes are appropriate, and no disputes are reported. Potential legal implications arise from restricted document access if it stems from the tender's design.

Requirements are well-detailed, referencing specific forms and documents, which enhances clarity. The description of the service is unambiguous. However, evaluation criteria are stated to be in a document but not explicitly extracted, potentially reducing immediate clarity.

Basic information, financial details, and detailed submission requirements are provided. All necessary forms are listed. However, the contract duration is not specified, and restricted document access hinders full information completeness for bidders.

The tender benefits from e-procurement and disclosed value. Requirements appear generic and not tailored. However, the flagged 'Restricted document access' is a critical impediment to fair competition and equal opportunity for all potential bidders.

Electronic submission is supported, which is practical. However, the absence of a clear contract start date and duration, coupled with restricted document access, creates practical challenges for bidders.

Key fields are largely populated, and dates are logical. The tender's internal data, such as the E-Procurement characteristic, is consistent. Any contradictions noted were primarily in the AI's flags/automated checks versus the tender's characteristics or document summaries.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green, social, or innovation criteria, nor is it EU-funded, indicating no specific focus on sustainability aspects.