UK Leisure Framework 2026-2034

This tender provides a solid foundation with clear basic information and a substantial estimated value, but it suffers from significant deficiencies in transparency and completeness, particularly regarding evaluation criteria and e-submission.

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV code, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Mandatory exclusion grounds are included. While the 'missing reveal date' is noted, it does not inherently indicate a legal non-compliance if the publication was timely. The lack of explicit evaluation criteria is a significant concern that impacts legal compliance regarding transparency.

The general description is adequate, and some requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical capability) are clearly stated. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria and the lack of explicit financial requirements significantly reduce the overall clarity for potential bidders.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and location is provided, and all listed documents are available. However, the tender is incomplete due to the critical absence of specific financial requirements and, most notably, the lack of defined evaluation criteria.

The tender's value is disclosed, and the requirements do not appear to be tailored to a specific company. However, the absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises transparency and objectivity, making it difficult for bidders to understand the basis of assessment. The lack of e-submission also presents a barrier to equal access and efficiency.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, which aids planning. However, the absence of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback, potentially increasing administrative burden and limiting accessibility for some bidders.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent (e.g., submission before contract start). The estimated value in EUR is consistent with the GBP value mentioned in document summaries. Minor inconsistencies include missing specific codes for type/procedure and the liable person.

The tender explicitly lacks any mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which typically encourages higher sustainability standards, indicating a very low emphasis on sustainability considerations.