Legal Compliance75/100
The tender clearly defines the procedure as a Dynamic Market under the Procurement Act 2023, providing a link to official guidance. CPV codes are appropriate, and no disputes are reported. The 15-day period from today's date to the submission deadline is reasonable. However, the AI summary notes a lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, which are typically a legal requirement.
•No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds detailed in the provided summary.
Clarity65/100
The description of the Dynamic Market is clear and unambiguous, explaining its nature and differences from traditional frameworks. However, the tender explicitly lacks specified evaluation criteria for joining the market, and the AI summary indicates missing details for financial requirements, which significantly impacts clarity for potential suppliers.
•No evaluation criteria specified for joining the Dynamic Market.
•No explicit financial requirements detailed in the provided summary.
Completeness70/100
Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and location are provided. However, the critical 'Tender Notice' document failed to download, and the AI summary highlights missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements. The absence of evaluation criteria also points to incompleteness.
•Missing evaluation criteria for Dynamic Market membership.
•One critical document ('Tender Notice') failed to download/summarize.
Fairness65/100
The Dynamic Market concept, being open to new suppliers at any time, promotes fairness. The value is disclosed, and e-procurement via a portal is supported. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria for qualifying suppliers is a significant concern, as it could lead to subjective assessment and reduce transparency.
•No explicit evaluation criteria specified, potentially impacting transparency and objectivity.
Practicality80/100
Electronic submission is supported via the e-tendering portal, and relevant URLs are provided. The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. The 'Download failed' for one document is a practical hurdle, but the overall setup supports practical engagement.
•One tender document ('Tender Notice') failed to download/summarize, potentially hindering access to full information.
Data Consistency90/100
Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are consistently populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and dates are logical. Minor inconsistencies include unpopulated 'Liable Person' and procedure codes.
•Some basic fields like 'Liable Person', 'Type Code', and 'Procedure Code' are unpopulated.
Sustainability50/100
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on broader sustainability objectives within this specific procurement tool.
•No explicit mention of green procurement criteria.
•No explicit mention of social aspects.